October 2020
Volume 20, Issue 11
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2020
“Number form area” distinguishes between numerals and other character categories during passive viewing: A meta-synthesis of representational similarity analyses with three studies
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Darren Yeo
    Vanderbilt University
    Nanyang Technological University
  • Courtney Pollack
    Boston College
  • Rebecca Merkley
    University of Western Ontario
    Carleton University
  • Daniel Ansari
    University of Western Ontario
  • Gavin Price
    Vanderbilt University
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  NSF (DRL 1660816, DRL 1750213); Brain Canada and NeuroDevNet award; Canada First Research Excellence Fund, NSERC, CIHR, and Canada Research Chairs Program; E.W.R Steacie Memorial Fellowship; HASS International PhD Scholarship: Nanyang Technological University & Ministry of Education (Singapore)
Journal of Vision October 2020, Vol.20, 733. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.733
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Darren Yeo, Courtney Pollack, Rebecca Merkley, Daniel Ansari, Gavin Price; “Number form area” distinguishes between numerals and other character categories during passive viewing: A meta-synthesis of representational similarity analyses with three studies. Journal of Vision 2020;20(11):733. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.733.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

A region in the posterior inferior temporal gyrus (pITG) is thought to be specialized for processing Arabic numerals. fMRI studies that compared passive viewing of numerals to other character types (e.g., letters and novel characters) have not found evidence of numeral preference in the pITG. However, recent studies showed that the engagement of the pITG is modulated by attention and task contexts, suggesting that passive viewing paradigms may be ill-suited for examining numeral specialization in the pITG. It is possible, however, that even if the strengths of responses to different category types are similar, the distributed response patterns (i.e., neural representations) in a candidate, meta-analytic numeral-preferring pITG region (“pITG-numerals”) may reveal categorical distinctions, even during passive viewing. Using representational similarity analyses with three datasets that share the same task paradigm and stimulus sets (Ns = 19, 32, and 37), we tested whether the neural representations of digits, letters, and novel characters in pITG-numerals were organized according to visual form and/or conceptual categories (e.g., familiar versus novel, numbers versus others). Small-scale frequentist and Bayesian meta-analyses of our dataset-specific findings revealed that the organization of neural representations in pITG-numerals is unlikely to be explained by differences in abstract shape (BF_+0 = 0.26), but can be explained by a categorical “digits versus letters” distinction (BF_+0s = 11.5 – 51.2), or even a “digits versus others” distinction (suggesting numeral preference) (BF_+0 = 13.6). These results suggest pITG-numerals is likely part of a neural pathway biased for processing objects with potential numerical relevance, and that this biased processing is evident even during passive viewing. Given that numerals and letters do not differ categorically in terms of shape, categorical distinction in pITG-numerals during passive viewing must reflect ontogenetic differentiation of symbol set representations based on repeated usage of numbers and letters in differing task contexts.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.