October 2020
Volume 20, Issue 11
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2020
Spatial modulation of feature-based interaction between working memory and perception
Author Affiliations
  • Chunyue Teng
    University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Bradley R. Postle
    University of Wisconsin-Madison
Journal of Vision October 2020, Vol.20, 778. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.778
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Chunyue Teng, Bradley R. Postle; Spatial modulation of feature-based interaction between working memory and perception. Journal of Vision 2020;20(11):778. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.778.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Content in working memory (WM) has been shown to interact with attentional selection (e.g., Olivers, Meijer, Theeuwes, 2006) and alter perceptual processing (Teng & Kravitz, 2019) in a stimulus-specific way, potentially through the shared recruitment of sensory cortices for perception and WM maintenance (sensory recruitment model; D’Esposito & Postle, 2015; Postle, 2015; Serences, 2016). Here, we directly tested the spatial specificity of this interaction with a psychophysical task. We predicted that if a feature maintained in WM is retinotopically organized, its influence on perception would be spatially specific. Alternatively, if WM activates feature channels globally similar to feature-based attention (Ester, Serences, & Awh, 2009), its influence would not be constrained by location. In a dual-task paradigm, observers first viewed simultaneous presentation of two oriented sample gratings, one on each side of central fixation, with a central cue indicating which one to remember. Next, a distinct discrimination grating appeared and subjects reported its orientation (left/right). Finally, they recalled the orientation of the cued sample. The discrimination stimuli either matched or mismatched the location and/or the orientation of the cued sample. The contrast of the discrimination gratings was manipulated to derive the contrast threshold to reliably perceive the orientation of the interleaved stimuli. We found that an orientation match between WM and discrimination stimuli boosted the perceived contrast of the interleaved stimuli only when their locations also matched. The contrast threshold was significantly lower in the orientation-match/location-match condition than the others. Furthermore, on location-nonmatch trials, recall precision declined, suggesting that shifting attention away from an item’s location might disrupt context-binding in visuo-object WM. These results suggest that the representation of location context in WM draws on the same resources used for the perception and discrimination of visual objects.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.