October 2020
Volume 20, Issue 11
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2020
Perceptual distraction disrupts control over visual memory encoding
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Blaire Dube
    The Ohio State University
  • Andrew B Leber
    The Ohio State University
  • Julie D Golomb
    The Ohio State University
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  NIH R01-EY025648 (JG), NSF 1848939 (JG and AL)
Journal of Vision October 2020, Vol.20, 859. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.859
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Blaire Dube, Andrew B Leber, Julie D Golomb; Perceptual distraction disrupts control over visual memory encoding. Journal of Vision 2020;20(11):859. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.859.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Given the complexity of our visual environments, a number of mechanisms help us prioritize goal-consistent visual information. When crossing the street, for instance, attention is constrained to relevant information, such as the crossing signal and position of a nearby vehicle. This relevant information can then be encoded into visual working memory (VWM) and used to guide behavior. The efficient use of these inherently capacity-limited mechanisms relies on filters that restrict irrelevant information from visual selection and VWM encoding. What happens to these filters when attention is captured by a distractor? Although the effects of attentional capture on response times are heavily studied, we know little about its broader consequences: we may take longer to locate the crossing signal, but we may also fail to encode the nearby vehicle. Does distraction also disrupt the filter that controls VWM encoding such that irrelevant distractor features are unnecessarily encoded? Participants performed two consecutive visual search tasks on each trial. In the first (S1), they located a target (T) among non-targets (Ls), all presented within colored squares. On 40% of trials, a distracting white border flashed briefly surrounding a non-target square—we hypothesized that the (task-irrelevant) color associated with this S1 salient distractor would be encoded into memory, thus impacting later search. In the second search (S2), participants located a uniquely oriented landolt-C stimulus. The S2 items were all white, except one colored singleton distractor; critically, its color sometimes matched a color from the S1 display, including the salient distractor. We observed exacerbated response time slowing (consistent with memory-driven capture) in this critical S2 condition relative to when the singleton matched an S1 control item color. We propose a novel Filter Disruption Theory: distraction disrupts the filter that controls access to VWM, resulting in the encoding of irrelevant inputs at the time of capture.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.