October 2020
Volume 20, Issue 11
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2020
Good deeds enhance beauty, but beauty does not affect goodness of deeds
Author Affiliations
  • Chen Zhao
    New York University, Department of Psychology
  • Aenne Brielmann
    New York University, Department of Psychology
  • Denis Pelli
    New York University, Department of Psychology
    Department of Psychology and Center for Neural Science
Journal of Vision October 2020, Vol.20, 871. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.871
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Chen Zhao, Aenne Brielmann, Denis Pelli; Good deeds enhance beauty, but beauty does not affect goodness of deeds. Journal of Vision 2020;20(11):871. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.871.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

The relation of morality to aesthetics matters in many fields, including social, perceptual, and cognitive psychology. Moral and aesthetic judgments mutually influence one another: People’s physical attractiveness influences how honest and trustworthy they appear, and people’s character influences how we judge their appearance. However, previous studies assessed people’s traits but neglected the behaviors associated with those traits. The current study aimed to explore the mutual influence between facial attractiveness and morality of the person’s actions. We used a photo-caption paradigm with two complementary tasks. In the beauty-rating task, we manipulated the morality of the behavior described in the caption (moral or immoral), and the participant rated the facial attractiveness of the actor in the photo; in the morality rating task, we manipulated facial attractiveness (attractive or unattractive), and the participant rated the morality of the behavior. We recruited 78 participants on Amazon Mechanical Turk. The results show that morality ratings do not differ for attractive (M = 2.99, SD = 0.56) versus unattractive faces (M = 2.95, SD = 0.56; t(54) = 0.25, p = 0.805). In contrast, attractiveness ratings are higher for actors described as behaving morally (M = 4.92, SD = 0.74) than for those described as behaving immorally (M = 3.82, SD = 0.93; t(52) = 4.76, p < 0.001). This means that the Halo Effect, i.e., more favorable judgment of an attractive person’s traits, does not extend to judgments of a person’s action. Apparently, attractiveness does not justify immoral behavior. Morality affects attractiveness, but attractiveness does not affect morality.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.