October 2020
Volume 20, Issue 11
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2020
The Effect of Training on Vertical Heading Discrimination in a Simulated Environment
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jong-Jin Kim
    Center for Vision Research, York University
  • Molly Gibson
    Center for Vision Research, York University
  • Meaghan McManus
    Center for Vision Research, York University
  • Laurence Harris
    Center for Vision Research, York University
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  LRH is supported by Discovery Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada and the Canadian Space Agency. JJK holds doctorate scholarship from VISTA program.
Journal of Vision October 2020, Vol.20, 888. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.888
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jong-Jin Kim, Molly Gibson, Meaghan McManus, Laurence Harris; The Effect of Training on Vertical Heading Discrimination in a Simulated Environment. Journal of Vision 2020;20(11):888. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.888.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

INTRODUCTION: People are less accurate at judging their vertical heading (2.5-3° error, ascending or descending), compared to horizontal heading (~1° error, left or right). Although vertical heading judgement is not so important in everyday life, it is very important for pilots when judging a landing approach. Here we address the impact of training on vertical heading judgement using a visually simulated landing task. METHODS: Untrained participants (15 males and 23 females; mean age = 20.1) performed vertical heading judgements in a virtual environment with a clearly defined ground plane and horizon. For three target angles (3°, 6° and 9°), they judged they would land before or after a target after a visually simulated descent of two seconds. After this test, half of the participants completed a flight simulator landing training task which provided feedback on their vertical heading performance (training group), while the other half completed a two-dimensional puzzle game (control group). The participants repeated then the vertical heading judgement test. Negative values indicate too shallow of an approach and consequently overshooting the target. RESULTS: Overall, participants overestimated their angle of descent, overshooting the target in their vertical heading judgements as consequence. The training group showed improvement in their accuracy in the second testing where the average error was significantly reduced after the landing training (from -1.92±.24° to -0.62±.22°, p < .001), while the control group did not (from -1.7±.44° to -1.3±35°, p = .187). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that with training using a flight simulator landing for variety of target angles, vertical heading judgments can become as accurate as horizontal heading judgments. This study is the first to show the effectiveness of training in vertical heading judgement in naïve individuals. The results are applicable in the field of aviation, informing possible strategies for pilot training.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.