October 2020
Volume 20, Issue 11
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2020
Bounce or stream? Motion dynamics modulate the audiovisual bounce inducing effect
Author Affiliations
  • Dorita H. F. Chang
    The University of Hong Kong
  • David Thinnes
    University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa
    Systems Neuroscience and Neurotechnology Unit, Homburg/Saarland
  • Pak Yam Au
    The University of Hong Kong
  • Danilo Maziero
    University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa
  • Victor Andrew Stenger
    University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa
  • Scott Sinnett
    University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa
  • Jonas Vibell
    University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa
Journal of Vision October 2020, Vol.20, 953. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.953
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Dorita H. F. Chang, David Thinnes, Pak Yam Au, Danilo Maziero, Victor Andrew Stenger, Scott Sinnett, Jonas Vibell; Bounce or stream? Motion dynamics modulate the audiovisual bounce inducing effect. Journal of Vision 2020;20(11):953. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.953.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

In classic audiovisual bounce inducing effect (ABE) demonstrations, the perceptual interpretation of two identical objects moving along the azimuth with uniform motion and towards opposite directions is bistable and depends on whether a sound is presented in coincidence with the point of overlap of the two objects’ motion trajectories. The mechanistic basis of the ABE is poorly understood. Here, we sought to characterize the mechanisms underlying the ABE in two experiments. In Experiment 1, we tested the effects of altering visual motion dynamics on bounce vs stream perceptual interpretations by presenting observers with events where the two discs moved with uniform rectilinear motion, acceleration, or deceleration. Sound was presented in coincidence with the point of overlap of the two objects or was absent, and object motion was varied (i.e., upwards or downwards). We found that motion dynamics acted to shift perceptual interpretations such that events with downwards accelerating visual motion were more likely to be interpreted as a ‘bounce’ event relative to those with uniform motion and decelerating motion. Curiously, there were no differences in perceptual interpretations between the three motion dynamics when stimuli moved in the upwards direction. In Experiment 2, we presented identical stimuli (downwards only) to observers while measuring functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) responses concurrently with behaviour in a 3T scanner. We found that events with accelerating- and to a lesser extent, decelerating motion, elicited stronger responses in a number of cortico-vestibular regions, including the posterior parietal cortex, premotor cortex, and the posterior insula, as compared to events containing uniform motion. Notably, responses in these regions also varied depending on perceptual interpretation (i.e., bounce vs stream). Our data suggest that the origins of the ABE extend beyond simple attentional mechanisms as commonly put forth and involves vestibular engagement.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.