September 2021
Volume 21, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2021
Hemifield effects on divided attention for dual tasks with visual objects
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Dina Popovkina
    University of Washington
  • John Palmer
    University of Washington
  • Cathleen Moore
    University of Iowa
  • Geoffrey Boynton
    University of Washington
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This work was supported in part by NIH NEI grant F32-EY030320 to DVP.
Journal of Vision September 2021, Vol.21, 2172. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Dina Popovkina, John Palmer, Cathleen Moore, Geoffrey Boynton; Hemifield effects on divided attention for dual tasks with visual objects. Journal of Vision 2021;21(9):2172. doi:

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Recent studies have shown a surprising hemifield effect in multiple object tracking: one can track twice as many objects in different hemifields as in a single hemifield. No such effect occurs in typical visual search tasks, but it has been reported in "multifocal" visual search, in which only some areas of the visual field are relevant. One hypothesis is that hemifield effects are specific to tasks requiring multifocal spatial attention (Alvarez, Gill, & Cavanagh, 2012, JOV). To test this hypothesis, we conducted a dual-task experiment in which observers made semantic categorizations of nameable objects. This divided attention paradigm requires multifocal spatial attention because there are separate foci for the two tasks. For each task, one must attend the task-relevant stimulus and ignore the other stimuli. Previous studies using a dual-task paradigm have shown large divided attention effects for object judgments, measured as the dual-task deficit (the difference in performance in single- and dual-task trials). In our experiment, 4 objects were presented simultaneously in separate quadrants, and participants made judgments about 1 of 4 objects (single-task trials) or 2 of 4 objects (dual-task trials). As in previous studies, there was a large dual-task deficit for object judgments. To address hemifield effects, the dual-task deficit for a unilateral condition with relevant objects within the same hemifield was compared to the dual-task deficit for a bilateral condition with relevant objects in separate hemifields. Preliminary results showed no difference in the dual-task deficits for unilateral and bilateral conditions. Unlike multiple object tracking, dual tasks revealed little or no hemifield effects for divided attention to multiple objects. These findings are not consistent with the hypothesis that such effects are specific to tasks with multifocal spatial attention.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.