September 2021
Volume 21, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2021
A line-doubling illusion
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Stuart Anstis
    UCSD
  • Patrick Cavanagh
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  NSERC Canada (PC), VISTA (PC), Dartmouth PBS (PC), UCSD Pathways to Retirement (SA).
Journal of Vision September 2021, Vol.21, 2059. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.2059
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Stuart Anstis, Patrick Cavanagh; A line-doubling illusion. Journal of Vision 2021;21(9):2059. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.2059.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

We present a novel ‘dazzle’ illusion in which a bar has the reverse polarity of the oblique square-wave grating on which it lies. When this bar is viewed in near peripheral vision, it can look doubled, as if there were two bars side by side and touching. During direct fixation the bar is seen veridically. But in near peripheral vision, say when one looks at the edge of the background, the bar looks doubled, like two bars side by a side, touching each other making three vertical edges (the middle one shared by the two bars). We examined two possible factors that could contribute to the effect – blurring and phase insensitivity of the periphery – but found that they played no role. We also asked whether it was contrast reversal or phase shift cause the line doubling. In the square wave grating, this contrast reversal that defines the bar is also a 180° phase shift relative to the background grating. To separate the two, we used pin-striped and ramp gratings where a 180° phase shift is quite different from a contrast reversal. In both cases, when the bar is phase shifted it appears doubled, but when it is contrast reversed it does not. We conclude that spatial phase reversal, not contrast reversal, is responsible for perceptual doubling.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×