September 2021
Volume 21, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2021
How motivated do I look? How humans fail and computer vision succeeds in interpreting facial behavior
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Marnix Naber
    Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
  • Mitchel Kappen
    Department of Head and Skin, Ghent University, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This research was supported by the Netherlands Scientific Organization Take-off valorisation grant (#17777)
Journal of Vision September 2021, Vol.21, 1978. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.1978
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Marnix Naber, Mitchel Kappen; How motivated do I look? How humans fail and computer vision succeeds in interpreting facial behavior. Journal of Vision 2021;21(9):1978. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.1978.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

An observer’s perception and interpretation of facial behavior of others is prone to error and bias due to attentional bottlenecks, heuristics, and the lack of proper feedback to learn from. Here we investigate an objective approach to the measurement of nonverbal behaviors to infer the motivation levels of webcam-recorded participants that executed an online, structured job interview. First, we implemented and developed artificial intelligence and computer vision algorithms to automatically detect participants’ facial muscle activity and emotional expressions in videos. The extracted facial features served as input to an unbiased, cross-validated model to predict the motivation levels of participants that they introspectively reported after the interview. The motivation judgments by the model outperformed human observers’ unreliable, invalid, and gender-biased judgments. In order to determine motivation, observers correctly pay attention to some of the relevant facial features but, unlike the model, fail to assign correct weights and signs. These findings mark the necessity and usefulness of novel, bias-free, and scientific approaches to observing and judging human behavior.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×