September 2021
Volume 21, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2021
Self-motion cues in the natural habitats of zebrafish support lower visual field bias
Author Affiliations
  • Emma Alexander
    School of Optometry & Vision Science Program, University of California, Berkeley
  • Venkatesh Krishna S.
    Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto
  • Tim C. Hladnik
    Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Institute of Neurobiology, University of Tübingen
  • Nicholas C. Guilbeault
    Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto
  • Lanya T. Cai
    School of Optometry & Vision Science Program, University of California, Berkeley
  • Tod R. Thiele
    Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto
  • Aristides B. Arrenberg
    Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Institute of Neurobiology, University of Tübingen
  • Emily A. Cooper
    School of Optometry & Vision Science Program, University of California, Berkeley
    Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley
Journal of Vision September 2021, Vol.21, 1974. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.1974
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Emma Alexander, Venkatesh Krishna S., Tim C. Hladnik, Nicholas C. Guilbeault, Lanya T. Cai, Tod R. Thiele, Aristides B. Arrenberg, Emily A. Cooper; Self-motion cues in the natural habitats of zebrafish support lower visual field bias. Journal of Vision 2021;21(9):1974. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.1974.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The optomotor response (OMR) behavior in larval zebrafish comprises swimming prompted by visual motion cues. This behavior is likely key to self-stabilization in moving aquatic environments. Larval zebrafish collect visual information from a very large field of view (>120 degrees both horizontally and vertically), but they preferentially respond to motion in the lower and posterior visual field with OMR (Wang et al., Cell Reports, 2020). We hypothesized that this preference reflects an adaptation to gather sensory signals from regions in the visual field where optical flow is most reliably informative about self-motion. To test this hypothesis, a video dataset was collected in nine natural shallow-water habitats located across the ecological range of the species. The videos were recorded using a 360-degree underwater camera, attached to a robotic gantry that moved through a series of controlled trajectories, including rotations and translations at multiple speeds. The total dataset includes several minutes of data for each trajectory, collected at 100 frames per second. Using an optical flow analysis on this dataset, we mapped the spatial distribution of several metrics of motion cue quality. We show that the lower visual field contains more texture information, produces more accurate motion cues over the dataset, and provides lower variance estimates of image motion from frame to frame. These factors likely contribute to more accurate and reliable self-motion estimates from the lower visual field compared to the upper visual field. The motion statistics found in our dataset both explain the lower-field bias seen in zebrafish OMR behavior and suggest practical design strategies for visual guidance systems in underwater robotics applications.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×