September 2021
Volume 21, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2021
Individual differences in the temporal dynamics of object-based attention
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Hao Lou
    University of Groningen
  • Monicque M. Lorist
    University of Groningen
  • Karin S. Pilz
    University of Groningen
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This work was supported by a China Scholarship Council (CSC) scholarship to HL (201906360170).
Journal of Vision September 2021, Vol.21, 1953. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.1953
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Hao Lou, Monicque M. Lorist, Karin S. Pilz; Individual differences in the temporal dynamics of object-based attention. Journal of Vision 2021;21(9):1953. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.1953.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Attention can be focused on specific locations in our visual field (space-based attention), but also spreads along objects (object-based attention). However, space- and object-based effects are prone to large individual differences, and whereas space-based effects are stable, object-based effects are not as prevalent as previously assumed. In the current study, we investigate whether the low prevalence of object-based effects is related to individual differences in the temporal dynamics of attentional selection. We measured space- and object-based effects on reaction times for individual participants in a two-rectangle discrimination task, in which cue-target intervals were varied between 50 and 600 ms. We used bootstrapping to investigate cue-to-target intervals with maximal object-based effects, and fast Fourier transform (FFT) to investigate the rhythmic sampling of visual space within and between objects. Whereas overall, space-based effects were robust and stable across all cue-to-target intervals for most participants, object-based effects were small and were only found for a small subset of participants. In the frequency domain, our results confirm rhythmic patterns of visual-target detection within (8 Hz) and between objects (4 Hz and 8 Hz). However, we found large inter-individual variability in sampling rhythm phases and no consistent phase relationship. Taken together, the low-prevalence of object-based effects cannot be explained by inter-individual variability in the temporal dynamics of attentional selection. Our results provide strong evidence for considering individual variations in developing theories of visual attention.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×