September 2021
Volume 21, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2021
Individual differences in the temporal dynamics of object-based attention
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Hao Lou
    University of Groningen
  • Monicque M. Lorist
    University of Groningen
  • Karin S. Pilz
    University of Groningen
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This work was supported by a China Scholarship Council (CSC) scholarship to HL (201906360170).
Journal of Vision September 2021, Vol.21, 1953. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Hao Lou, Monicque M. Lorist, Karin S. Pilz; Individual differences in the temporal dynamics of object-based attention. Journal of Vision 2021;21(9):1953.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Attention can be focused on specific locations in our visual field (space-based attention), but also spreads along objects (object-based attention). However, space- and object-based effects are prone to large individual differences, and whereas space-based effects are stable, object-based effects are not as prevalent as previously assumed. In the current study, we investigate whether the low prevalence of object-based effects is related to individual differences in the temporal dynamics of attentional selection. We measured space- and object-based effects on reaction times for individual participants in a two-rectangle discrimination task, in which cue-target intervals were varied between 50 and 600 ms. We used bootstrapping to investigate cue-to-target intervals with maximal object-based effects, and fast Fourier transform (FFT) to investigate the rhythmic sampling of visual space within and between objects. Whereas overall, space-based effects were robust and stable across all cue-to-target intervals for most participants, object-based effects were small and were only found for a small subset of participants. In the frequency domain, our results confirm rhythmic patterns of visual-target detection within (8 Hz) and between objects (4 Hz and 8 Hz). However, we found large inter-individual variability in sampling rhythm phases and no consistent phase relationship. Taken together, the low-prevalence of object-based effects cannot be explained by inter-individual variability in the temporal dynamics of attentional selection. Our results provide strong evidence for considering individual variations in developing theories of visual attention.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.