September 2021
Volume 21, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2021
Individual differences in crowding predict visual search performance
Author Affiliations
  • Ines Verissimo
    Cognitive Psychology, Institute for Brain and Behaviour, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
  • Stefanie Holsken
    Cognitive Psychology, Institute for Brain and Behaviour, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
  • Christian NL Olivers
    Cognitive Psychology, Institute for Brain and Behaviour, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Journal of Vision September 2021, Vol.21, 1913. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.1913
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ines Verissimo, Stefanie Holsken, Christian NL Olivers; Individual differences in crowding predict visual search performance. Journal of Vision 2021;21(9):1913. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.1913.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Visual search is an integral part of human behavior, and has proven important to understanding mechanisms of perception, attention, memory, and oculomotor control. Thus far, the dominant theoretical framework posits that search is mainly limited by covert attentional mechanisms, comprising a central bottleneck in visual processing. A different class of theories seeks the cause in the inherent limitations of peripheral vision, with search being constrained by what is known as the functional viewing field (FVF). One of the major factors limiting peripheral vision, and thus the FVF, is crowding. We adopted an individual differences approach to test the prediction from FVF theories that visual search performance is determined by the efficacy of peripheral vision, in particular crowding. Forty-four participants were assessed with regard to their sensitivity to crowding (as measured by critical spacing) and their search efficiency (as indicated by manual responses and eye movements). This revealed substantial correlations between the two tasks, as stronger susceptibility to crowding was predictive of slower search, more eye movements, and longer fixation durations. Our results support FVF theories in showing that peripheral vision imposes an important limitation on visual search.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×