September 2021
Volume 21, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2021
Retaining Quantitative-dimension Binding in Working Memory: A Passive Process
Author Affiliations
  • Qi Gao
    Zhejiang University
  • Xueyi Wan
    Zhejiang University
  • Mowei Shen
    Zhejiang University
  • Zaifeng Gao
    Zhejiang University
Journal of Vision September 2021, Vol.21, 2524. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.2524
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Qi Gao, Xueyi Wan, Mowei Shen, Zaifeng Gao; Retaining Quantitative-dimension Binding in Working Memory: A Passive Process. Journal of Vision 2021;21(9):2524. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.2524.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The binding problem is one of the core issues in working memory (WM), and has been explored extensively. Recent studies suggested that retaining bindings in WM requires more object-based attention than retaining constituent single dimensions. While human beings have evolved unique capabilities of quantity processing, no study so far has explored the attentional mechanism of retaining quantitative-dimension bindings in WM, which may be endowed with a unique attention mechanism. The current study aimed to explore whether extra object-based attention is required in retaining quantitative-dimension bindings in WM via a dual-task paradigm. Participants were required to memorize feature dimensions or the bindings between two dimensions in a change detection task. Critically, a secondary transparent motion task was added to compete for object-based attention with the memory array. If object-based attention plays a pivotal role in retaining bindings in WM, the secondary task would lead to a larger impairment for bindings relative to constitute dimensions (selective binding impairment). Line’s length and circle’s area were used as the representatives of quantitative-dimensions, while colors and locations were used as qualitative-dimensions. We found that the secondary task did not lead to a selective binding impairment for bindings containing quantitative-dimensions (Experiments 1 and 5 length-color, Experiment 2 length-location, and Experiment 3 area-color), which is against the bindings without quantitative-dimensions (Experiment 4 color-location; as well as ample previous studies). The results suggested that retaining quantitative-dimension bindings in WM is a passive process, and does not require extra object-based attention relative to the constituent single dimensions.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×