September 2021
Volume 21, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2021
The spatial distribution of exogenous attention within and across hemifields
Author Affiliations
  • Yong Hoon Chung
    Dartmouth College
  • Jonathan Keefe
    UC San Diego
  • Viola Stoermer
    Dartmouth College
Journal of Vision September 2021, Vol.21, 2451. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.2451
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Yong Hoon Chung, Jonathan Keefe, Viola Stoermer; The spatial distribution of exogenous attention within and across hemifields. Journal of Vision 2021;21(9):2451. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.2451.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Exogenous, or involuntary, attention refers to the automatic orienting response to a location where a salient cue has occurred. Many studies have demonstrated that perceptual processing is improved at validly cued locations (cue and target at the same location) relative to invalidly cued locations (cue and target at different locations), with seemingly little influence of visual field location (Henderson & Macquistan, 1993). However, other research on endogenous attention has demonstrated differences in attentional performance within vs. across hemifields (e.g., Alvarez & Cavanagh, 2005; Strong & Alvarez, 2020), suggesting that there are independent attentional resources in each visual hemisphere. To test whether similar constraints are present during exogenous attention we assessed the spatial distribution of exogenous attention in a visual cueing paradigm. Participants (N = 49) performed a task discriminating the tilt of a masked Gabor patch target presented randomly at one of four locations evenly distributed around a central fixation point. Shortly prior to the onset of the target, a spatially non-predictive salient visual cue (a white circle outlining the location) appeared randomly at one of the four possible target locations, thus yielding four possible cueing conditions: validly cued, invalid same-hemifield, invalid different-hemifield, and invalid diagonal. Analysis on visual discrimination accuracy showed reliable differences among the cueing conditions (p< 0.015) with highest performance for the validly cued locations. Interestingly, we observed a smaller cueing benefit when comparing valid vs. within-hemifield-invalid relative to valid vs. across-hemifield-invalid, possibly suggesting that the spatial distribution of exogenous attention is constrained by the architecture of the visual system.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×