Journal of Vision Cover Image for Volume 21, Issue 9
September 2021
Volume 21, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2021
Dynamic presentation boosts the Ebbinghaus illusion but eliminates simultaneous contrast and Muller-lyer
Author Affiliations
  • Saki Takao
    York University
    Waseda University
  • Katsumi Watanabe
    Waseda University
  • Patrick Cavanagh
    York University
Journal of Vision September 2021, Vol.21, 2338. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.2338
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Saki Takao, Katsumi Watanabe, Patrick Cavanagh; Dynamic presentation boosts the Ebbinghaus illusion but eliminates simultaneous contrast and Muller-lyer. Journal of Vision 2021;21(9):2338. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.2338.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Mruczek et al (2015) showed that a dynamic version of the Ebbinghaus illusion almost doubles in strength compared to the standard version. In their dynamic version, the size of the surrounding inducers was modulated between large and small over about 1 second and the whole stimulus was also made to drift during the surround modulation. We explored many simultaneous contrast and geometric illusions and found no increase from dynamic presentation in any that we sampled. Here we report only the results for simultaneous orientation contrast and Müller-Lyer and surprisingly, when these two illusions were presented dynamically, their effects were actually eliminated. It is not yet clear why only these Ebbinghaus illusion increases with dynamic presentation. We offer the same explanation that Mruczek and colleagues proposed (2015) – with static presentation, information about actual size and position accumulates from the receptive fields at that location. When the illusion figures are dynamic (moving or flashed), however, individual receptive fields cannot accumulate the corrective information and the illusion strength is less constrained. This hypothesis does not account for why orientation contrast and the Müller-Lyer illusions are eliminated as opposed to amplified.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×