September 2021
Volume 21, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2021
Motor adaptations for object size perception and grasping
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Pablo Sanz Diez
    Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH
    Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen
  • Annalisa Bosco
    Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna
  • Patrizia Fattori
    Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna
  • Siegfried Wahl
    Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH
    Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This work was supported by the European Grant PLATYPUS (Grant Agreement No 734227), a Marie Sklodowska-Curie RISE initiative.
Journal of Vision September 2021, Vol.21, 2258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.2258
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Pablo Sanz Diez, Annalisa Bosco, Patrizia Fattori, Siegfried Wahl; Motor adaptations for object size perception and grasping. Journal of Vision 2021;21(9):2258. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.2258.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Our research aimed to evaluate whether size perception and saccadic amplitude were affected before and after grasping a variable-size target under the presence (TF) or absence of tactile feedback (NoTF). Twenty-one volunteers (mean-age: 25.05±4.08years) participated. Volunteers were tested in four blocks of 30 trials. Each trial consisted of 3 consecutive phases: pre-grasping estimation, grasping and post-grasping estimation. During pre- and post-, participants were asked to perform a saccadic eye movement to a horizontal bar and manually indicate its horizontal size by extending index and thumb fingers. In the grasping phase, participants were instructed to make a grasping action towards the bar. While grasping, 30% of the trials had a random horizontal size perturbation, which meant a lengthening or shortening of 33% of the original size. In sixty trials, grasping action was assisted by TF implemented through mobile phone vibration motors. A motion caption system recorded and assessed participant’s hand position. Participant’s gaze was recorded by a mobile eye-tracker. During the post-estimation phase, the non-perturbation condition revealed an inverse relationship between saccadic amplitude and bar size (r=-0.69 and P=0.03, for both NoTF and TF). However, the same indirect relationship during shortening (NoTF: r=-0.17 and P=0.66; TF: r=-0.56 and P=0.15) and lengthening (NoTF: r=-0.46 and P=0.25; TF: r=-0.24 and P=0.50) conditions was not found. Grip aperture showed a significant correlation in all post-phase conditions for both NoTF and TF (r>0.93 and P<0.001). Comparing pre- and post-phase values, both NoTF and TF evidenced that lengthening condition caused a significant reduction in grip aperture (p=0.02 and p=0.04, respectively), whereas shortening did not reveal significant changes (P=0.74 and P=0.53). A significant increase in saccadic amplitude after shortening condition in TF was observed (P<0.001), but not in NoTF (P=0.22). Horizontal target size perturbation and tactile feedback during grasping execution modifies size perception and saccadic amplitude.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×