September 2021
Volume 21, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2021
Humans can smoothly pursue but fail to intercept accelerating targets
Author Affiliations
  • Philipp Kreyenmeier
    Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
    Graduate Program of Neuroscience, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
  • Luca Kämmer
    Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
  • Jolande Fooken
    Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
  • Miriam Spering
    Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
    Graduate Program of Neuroscience, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
    Djavad Mowafaghian Centre or Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
    Institute for Computing, Information, and Cognitive Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Journal of Vision September 2021, Vol.21, 2838. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.2838
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Philipp Kreyenmeier, Luca Kämmer, Jolande Fooken, Miriam Spering; Humans can smoothly pursue but fail to intercept accelerating targets. Journal of Vision 2021;21(9):2838. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.2838.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The ability to accurately judge the acceleration of moving objects is critical to our survival. Whereas the perceptual system is surprisingly insensitive to acceleration, humans can accurately track accelerating targets with smooth pursuit eye movements. When the target is briefly occluded, predictive pursuit scales with target acceleration, indicating that the oculomotor system forms an acceleration-based prediction of target motion. Here we ask whether acceleration is taken into account when manually intercepting accelerating targets. Participants (n=16) viewed a small disk that moved along a horizontal path with one of four constant, linear levels of acceleration (-8,-4,+4,+8 m/s/s). The target was shown for 800 ms before temporary occlusion. Target velocity was always 20°/s at the time of occlusion, allowing us to test whether participants based their interception on the final target velocity before occlusion, or on continuous target acceleration. Participants had to predict the time of target reappearance by manually intercepting it with a quick pointing movement of their right hand. We recorded participants’ eye and 3D-hand position using an EyeLink 1000 eye tracker and a trakSTAR electromagnetic motion tracking system. The correspondence between target acceleration and eye (smooth pursuit acceleration) or hand (interception timing) were assessed using linear regression. Pursuit acceleration closely matched target acceleration (median slope = .83; 95% CI = [.73, 1.27]). In contrast, participants did not take acceleration into account when timing their manual interception (median slope = -.33; 95% CI = [-.46, -.07]), yielding systematic interception errors–too early for decelerating targets and too late for accelerating targets. Our results show that the oculomotor system can rely on continuous sampling of the target motion, yielding a pursuit response sensitive to target acceleration. Yet, humans might be limited in their ability to predict accelerating targets for hand movement control, relying on the final target velocity sample prior to occlusion.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×