September 2021
Volume 21, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2021
Effects of Age are Not Uniform Across Cognitive Processes: A Repeated-measures ERP Study
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Catherine Reed
    Claremont McKenna College
  • Chandlyr Denaro
    Claremont McKenna College
  • Astrid Petropoulos
    Carleton College
  • Anjali Thapar
    Bryn Mawr College
  • Alan Hartley
    Claremont McKenna College
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  NSF IUSE #1625521, #1625610, #1626554
Journal of Vision September 2021, Vol.21, 2733. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.2733
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Catherine Reed, Chandlyr Denaro, Astrid Petropoulos, Anjali Thapar, Alan Hartley; Effects of Age are Not Uniform Across Cognitive Processes: A Repeated-measures ERP Study. Journal of Vision 2021;21(9):2733. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.2733.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Does aging affect neural processing similarly across cognitive tasks or does it target specific cognitive processing mechanisms? Frequent findings of increased latency and reduced amplitude in older adults suggest the possibility of a general mechanism. However, no study has tested this hypothesis directly by comparing processing within the same individuals across multiple tasks. In our study, older (ages 60-85) and younger (ages 18-30) adults participated in four tasks (CORE; Kappenman et al., 2020) while EEG was collected: face processing (N170; one-back for faces, cars, scrambled faces, and scrambled cars), attention and categorization (P3; visual odd-ball), semantic processing (N400; word-pair semantic judgment), and error processing (ERN; flanker task). Each group had 17 participants with complete data across all tasks. Results showed differential age-related condition effects for different tasks. For the N170, older and younger adults showed similar amplitude differences between faces and cars at P07/P08 electrodes. For the ERN, no significant age-related differences were found for error versus correct response amplitude differences at central electrodes. In contrast, age-related differences were found for the P3 and N400 ERPs at centroparietal electrodes in terms of smaller condition amplitude differences and less focal distributions of neural responses. Specifically, older adult amplitudes differed from younger adults for the target, but not the standard, condition (P3) and for the related, but not the unrelated, word-pair conditions (N400). An age by task interaction of standardized difference wave amplitudes confirmed significant age-group differences for the P3 and N400, but not for the N170 and ERN. Thus, aging does not affect neural processing similarly across these four cognitive tasks within individuals.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×