September 2021
Volume 21, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2021
Understanding how analysis choices are essential for the meaningful interpretation of visual working memory data
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Polina Iamshchinina
    Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, Berlin 14195, Germany
    Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, Berlin 10099, Germany
  • Thomas B. Christophel
    Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience and Berlin Center for Advanced Neuroimaging and Clinic for Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
    Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, Berlin 10099, Germany
  • Surya Gayet
    Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands 
  • Rosanne L. Rademaker
    Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands 
    Department of Psychology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
    Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This work was supported by Berlin School of Mind and Brain PhD scholarship (PI), DFG Emmy Noether Research Group Grant CH 1674/2-1 (TBC), Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research Vl.Veni.191G.085 (SG) and Marie Sklodowska-Curie Individual Global Fellowship No 743941 (RLR).
Journal of Vision September 2021, Vol.21, 2721. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.2721
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Polina Iamshchinina, Thomas B. Christophel, Surya Gayet, Rosanne L. Rademaker; Understanding how analysis choices are essential for the meaningful interpretation of visual working memory data. Journal of Vision 2021;21(9):2721. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.9.2721.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Visual working memory (VWM) relies on a distributed cortical network. Yet, the role of individual cortical areas, like early visual cortex (EVC) and intraparietal sulcus (IPS), remains debated. Criteria have been suggested to determine if an area is essential for storage, such as resiliency against visual distraction, and correlations with behavior. Here, we reanalyzed existing data from two independent labs, and caution that adherence to simple criteria could limit our comprehension of the VWM system. Instead, we encourage close consideration of analysis choices for a more complete perspective. When participants remembered an orientation while simultaneously viewing different visual distractors (Rademaker et al., 2019) fMRI activity patterns in EVC and IPS did not distinguish between distractor conditions. While such resiliency implies that both areas are critical for VWM storage, the analysis used (leave-one-out cross-validation) capitalizes on any signal differentiating memory representations during the delay. Instead, an analysis using sensory driven responses for model-training captures only representations that are “sensory-like”, and can yield different conclusions. That analysis choices matter is further illustrated by a task with two memory items – one attended, one unattended (Christophel et al., 2018). Originally, delay-period representations of unattended items were not found in EVC. Our reanalysis reveals that with a model trained on stronger signals (the attended instead of the unattended items) EVC does represent unattended memory items. Finally, both datasets reveal a brain-behavior relationship in EVC, but not IPS. Before declaring EVC essential to storage, a careful examination of analysis choices (like the quantification and read-out of neural error) should be performed to guide interpretation. In sum, a thorough understanding of analyses and the specific principles they test is crucial for unraveling the mechanisms of VWM.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×