September 2021
Volume 21, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2021
Ability of the peripheral visual field to maintain motor alignment
Author Affiliations
  • Sonisha Neupane
    Indiana University School of Optometry
  • Clara Mestre
    Indiana University School of Optometry
  • T Rowan Candy
    Indiana University School of Optometry
Journal of Vision September 2021, Vol.21, 2679. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sonisha Neupane, Clara Mestre, T Rowan Candy; Ability of the peripheral visual field to maintain motor alignment. Journal of Vision 2021;21(9):2679.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Objective: Some patients are believed to use peripheral vision to achieve motor eye alignment. The objective of this study was to test the ability of peripheral field to drive vergence. Method: 8 adults (15 to 51 years) participated. Naturalistic images (SYNS dataset) were presented dichoptically (80x60deg) with a monocular fixation target and binocular mean luminance simulated central scotoma (radii 0,5,10,15,20, or 25 deg). The scotoma had a smooth transition to the image and antiphase serration in the periphery in two eyes. In each trial, the subjects performed a nonius task to confirm alignment before the image stepped to a disparity (0,0.5,1,2,4, or 8 deg) for 1.5 secs while responses were recorded with an Eyelink1000 (SR-Research). Six repetitions were performed in random order. Results: Disparity tuning with no scotoma was similar to the previous literature, peaking at 1° disparity for divergent & 2° for convergent stimuli. Mean open loop vergence amplitude at the second latency point for 0°, 5°, 10°, 15°, 20° & 25° scotoma were 0.41+/-0.23, 0.42+/-0.18, 0.62+/-0.14, 0.42+/-0.13, 0.21+/-0.11, 0.21+/-0.45 deg when averaged across 2° convergent and divergent disparities. At 0° scotoma, subjects were able to respond to the smallest disparity, but as scotoma size increased (at 20°& 25°), there was minimal response to disparity < 2°. Conclusion: Peripheral visual field (to 40° eccentricity) is able to initiate vergence responses to the removal of a 25° radius central scotoma, with reduction in response amplitude that varies across individuals. The highest amplitude was at 2-deg of disparity for all scotoma sizes. This has implications for understanding how patients with central scotomas resulting from suppression or retinal pathology may be able to maintain eye alignment.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.