September 2021
Volume 21, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2021
Stronger BOLD responses along the horizontal meridian in V1
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Kendrick Kay
    University of Minnesota
  • Omer Faruk Gulban
    Maastricht University, The Netherlands
    Brain Innovation, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • Jonathan A. Winawer
    New York University
  • Jan W. Kurzawski
    New York University
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  Research was supported by NIH grants R01 EY027964, NIH R01 MH111417, NIH R01 EY027401, NIH P41 EB027061, NSF IIS-1822683, and NSF IIS-1822929.
Journal of Vision September 2021, Vol.21, 2608. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kendrick Kay, Omer Faruk Gulban, Jonathan A. Winawer, Jan W. Kurzawski; Stronger BOLD responses along the horizontal meridian in V1. Journal of Vision 2021;21(9):2608.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

In three previously collected neuroimaging datasets (HCP 7T Retinotopy, n = 181; Temporal Decomposition through Manifold Fitting, n = 5; Natural Scenes Dataset, n = 8), we find large asymmetries in the magnitude of the BOLD response in primary visual cortex (V1): stimulus-evoked BOLD responses, expressed as percent change above baseline, are up to 50% stronger along the representation of the horizontal meridian compared to the vertical meridian. While this effect is quite robust, it remains unclear whether magnitude differences in the BOLD signal between locations can be interpreted as differences in local neural activity. To investigate this issue, we systematically evaluated the potential contribution of a number of non-neural factors to the observed effect, including cortical thickness, cortical folding, cortical depth, and vasculature. We find that only two of these factors have substantial relationship to the size of BOLD responses: cortical thickness and presence of macrovasculature (as indexed by T2*-weighted signal intensity). The relationship generalizes across subjects and brain regions, indicating that variation in BOLD response magnitudes across brain locations partly reflects differences in cortical thickness and vascularization. To compensate for these confounding factors, we then implement several regression-based correction methods and show that BOLD responses, after correction, become more spatially homogeneous. However, even after correction, BOLD response asymmetries in V1 still persist. This suggests a genuine neural substrate for previously reported asymmetries in behavioral performance, wherein performance is best along the horizontal meridian (Carrasco et al., Spatial Vision, 2001). More broadly, these results enhance the ability of neuroscientists to make correct inferences about local neural activity from fMRI data.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.