February 2022
Volume 22, Issue 3
Open Access
Optica Fall Vision Meeting Abstract  |   February 2022
Contributed Session II: The mechanisms underlying enhanced auditory motion perception in early blind individuals
Author Affiliations
  • Woon Ju Park
    Department of Psychology, University of Washington, USA
  • Ione Fine
    Department of Psychology, University of Washington, USA
Journal of Vision February 2022, Vol.22, 25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.3.25
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Woon Ju Park, Ione Fine; Contributed Session II: The mechanisms underlying enhanced auditory motion perception in early blind individuals. Journal of Vision 2022;22(3):25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.3.25.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Introduction. Previous studies have shown increased sensitivity to auditory motion in early blind (EB) individuals. However, the mechanisms underlying this enhanced performance remains unknown. We estimated auditory motion filters in EB using a psychophysical reverse correlation paradigm—the auditory analogue of Neri (2014). Methods. Participants (8 EB and 8 sighted controls (SC)) discriminated the direction of a signal motion (left/right) embedded in broadband noise bursts (500-14,000 Hz) presented over a 10x10 grid (space: -/+30 °; time: 0-800 ms). Amplitude of signal motion was adjusted using staircases to maintain performance at 65%. We made two independent measurements: tuning of auditory motion filters (how noise bursts influence the probability of hearing motion direction), and amplitude threshold for hearing the signal. Results. The estimated filters for both EB and SC were predominantly responsive to sound onsets/offsets, different from the non-separable spatiotemporal selectivity previously observed for visual motion. Also, the filters for EB were more accurate in detecting signal onsets/offsets across both space and time. This more refined tuning successfully predicted the greater sensitivity to hear signal motion in EB, as measured by the amplitude threshold (t(14) = -5.59, p < .001). Thus, EB individuals show subtle qualitative rather than quantitative differences in auditory motion processing that nonetheless result in significant improvements in perception.

 Funding: Weill Neurohub Postdoctoral Fellowship to WP; NEI R01 EY014645 to IF.

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.