December 2022
Volume 22, Issue 14
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2022
A nasal visual field advantage in interocular competition
Author Affiliations
  • Chris Paffen
    Utrecht University
  • Andre Sahakian
    Utrecht University
  • Stefan Van der Stigchel
    Utrecht University
  • Surya Gayet
    Utrecht University
Journal of Vision December 2022, Vol.22, 3334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3334
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Chris Paffen, Andre Sahakian, Stefan Van der Stigchel, Surya Gayet; A nasal visual field advantage in interocular competition. Journal of Vision 2022;22(14):3334. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3334.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

When two images are presented dichoptically (that is, a different image is presented to each eye), one of them will temporarily dominate perception, leaving the other suppressed. This phenomenon is called binocular rivalry and is presumably caused by interocular competition (IOC). Although many stimulus attributes are known to affect IOC (e.g., stimulus contrast, luminance, and spatial frequency), it is less clear how IOC is affected by the visual field location of the images. We examined five independent datasets of breaking continuous flash suppression (b-CFS; a variant of binocular rivalry) experiments, to establish the role of visual hemifield (VHF) in IOC. B-CFS involves presenting a target of increasing intensity to one eye, and a dynamic mask to the other eye. Initially, the mask is perceived, but after some time the target ‘breaks’ into awareness. We investigated whether the time that observers needed to report an interocularly suppressed target depended on the VHF (nasal or temporal) to which the target was presented. We find that, across all datasets, targets presented in the nasal VHF broke suppression 23% faster than targets presented in the temporal VHF. Furthermore, we find that the nasal advantage was larger for the non-dominant eye (within-observers) and increased with increasing dominance of the dominant eye (between-observers). From these findings we conclude that targets in the nasal VHF enjoy a competitive advantage in IOC. Finally, we suggest that the reported nasal VHF advantage serves a functional role in everyday vision: When a distant fixated object is partly occluded by an object that is closer to the observer, the occluded part of the fixated object is in the nasal hemifield for one eye, while the occluding object is in the temporal hemifield of the other eye. Perception of the fixated object is facilitated by giving it a competitive advantage.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×