December 2022
Volume 22, Issue 14
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2022
Methodological limits on sampling visual experience with mobile eye tracking
Author Affiliations
  • Mark Lescroart
    University of Nevada, Reno
  • Kamran Binaee
    University of Nevada, Reno
  • Bharath Shankar
    University of Nevada, Reno
  • Christian Sinnott
    University of Nevada, Reno
  • Jennifer A. Hart
    Bates College
  • Arnab Biswas
    University of Nevada, Reno
  • Ilya Nudnou
    North Dakota State University
  • Benjamin Balas
    North Dakota State University
  • Michelle R. Greene
    Bates College
  • Paul MacNeilage
    University of Nevada, Reno
Journal of Vision December 2022, Vol.22, 3201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3201
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Mark Lescroart, Kamran Binaee, Bharath Shankar, Christian Sinnott, Jennifer A. Hart, Arnab Biswas, Ilya Nudnou, Benjamin Balas, Michelle R. Greene, Paul MacNeilage; Methodological limits on sampling visual experience with mobile eye tracking. Journal of Vision 2022;22(14):3201. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3201.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Humans explore the world with their eyes, so an ideal sampling of human visual experience requires accurate gaze estimates while participants perform a wide range of activities in diverse locations. In principle, mobile eye tracking can provide this information, but in practice, many technical barriers and human factors constrain the activities, locations, and participants that can be sampled accurately. In this talk we present our progress in addressing these barriers to build the Visual Experience Database. First, we describe how the hardware design of our mobile eye tracking system balances participant comfort and data quality. Ergonomics matter, because uncomfortable equipment affects behavior and reduces the reasonable duration of recordings. Second, we describe the challenges of sampling outdoors. Bright sunlight causes squinting, casts shadows, and reduces eye video contrast, all of which reduce estimated gaze accuracy and precision. We will show how appropriate image processing at acquisition improves eye video contrast, and how DNN-based pupil detection can improve estimated pupil position. Finally, we will show how physical shift of the equipment on the head affects estimated gaze quality. We quantify the reduction in gaze precision and accuracy over time due to slippage, in terms of drift of the eye in the image frame and instantaneous jitter of the camera with respect to the eye. Addressing these limitations takes us some way towards achieving a representative sample of visual experience, but recording of long-duration, of highly dynamic activities, and in extreme lighting conditions remains challenging.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×