December 2022
Volume 22, Issue 14
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2022
How can we provide stronger empirical evidence for probabilistic representations in visual processing?
Author Affiliations
  • Ömer Dağlar Tanrıkulu
    Cognitive Science Program, Williams College, MA, USA
Journal of Vision December 2022, Vol.22, 3169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3169
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ömer Dağlar Tanrıkulu; How can we provide stronger empirical evidence for probabilistic representations in visual processing?. Journal of Vision 2022;22(14):3169. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3169.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Probabilistic approaches to cognition have had great empirical success, especially in building computational models of perceptual processes. This success has led researchers to propose that the visual system represents sensory information probabilistically, which resulted in high-profile studies exploring the role of probabilistic representations in visual perception. Yet, there is still substantial disagreement over the conclusions that can be drawn from this work. In the first part of this talk, I will outline the critical views over the probabilistic nature of visual perception. Some critics underline the inability of experimental methodologies to distinguish between perceptual processes and perceptual decisions, while others point to the successful utilization of non-probabilistic representational schemes in explaining these experimental results. In the second part of the talk, I will propose two criteria that must be satisfied to provide empirical evidence for probabilistic visual representations. The first criterion requires experiments to demonstrate that representations involving probability distributions are actually generated by the visual system, rather than being imposed on the task by the experimenter. The second criterion requires the utilization of structural correspondence (as opposed to correlation) between the internal states of the visual system and stimulus uncertainty. Finally, I will illustrate how these two criteria can be met through a psychophysical methodology using priming effects in visual search tasks.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×