December 2022
Volume 22, Issue 14
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2022
Assessing the contribution of eye movements to slow binocular reading in children with amblyopia
Author Affiliations
  • Dorsa Mir Norouzi
    Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, TX
  • Lori Dao
    ABC Eyes Pediatric Ophthalmology, PA, Dallas, TX
  • Cynthia Beauchamp
    ABC Eyes Pediatric Ophthalmology, PA, Dallas, TX
  • David Stager, Jr
    Pediatric Ophthalmology & Adult Strabismus, PA, Plano, TX
  • Jeffrey Hunter
    Heaton Eye Associates, Tyler, TX
  • Krista Kelly
    Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, TX
    UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
Journal of Vision December 2022, Vol.22, 3106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3106
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Dorsa Mir Norouzi, Lori Dao, Cynthia Beauchamp, David Stager, Jr, Jeffrey Hunter, Krista Kelly; Assessing the contribution of eye movements to slow binocular reading in children with amblyopia. Journal of Vision 2022;22(14):3106. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3106.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Introduction: Previous research has shown a relationship between slow silent reading in amblyopic children and ocular motor dysfunction (i.e., fixation instability, increased forward saccades) during binocular viewing (1,2). Here, we investigated the hypothesis that children with amblyopia will read at a similar speed as controls if the need for inter-word saccades is removed during binocular reading. Methods: Silent reading was assessed during binocular viewing in amblyopic children aged 7-12 years and compared to an age-similar control group. Children silently read grade-appropriate sentences presented in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP; single word presentation at screen center). Participants were asked a ‘yes/no’ question after each sentence. Words in each sentence had the same exposure time. Exposure time per sentence changed based on a descending adaptive 2 down-1 up staircase method to determine the child’s reading speed threshold in log words per minute (WPM). Results: A total of 16 amblyopic children (mean age±SD=9.6±1.3 years, mean amblyopic eye visual acuity±SD=0.4±0.2 logMAR) and 14 control children (10.1±1.2 years, 0.0±.00 logMAR) were enrolled. During binocular viewing, amblyopic children read slower than age-matched controls (2.6±0.5 log WPM vs 3.0±0.4 log WPM, U=64, p=0.044). Conclusions: Amblyopic children read slower than control children, regardless of whether the text is presented in a fixed location (i.e., RSVP reading) or if the reader has to scan the text in a conventional manner (i.e., paragraph reading). Removing the need for inter-word saccades during silent, binocular reading does not help amblyopic children to read at a similar speed as controls. However, this finding does not rule out a role for other types of ocular motor dysfunction such as fixation instability in slow reading. Other possible factors to slow reading in amblyopia may be crowding and reduced visual span. Slow reading in children with amblyopia may hinder academic success.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×