December 2022
Volume 22, Issue 14
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2022
Exogenous attention effects persist into Visual Working Memory
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Luke Huszar
    New York Unviersity
  • Tair Vizel
    Tel Aviv University
  • Marisa Carrasco
    New York Unviersity
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  NIH training grant 5T32EY007136-28 (Movshon); NIH R01-EY019693 (Carrasco)
Journal of Vision December 2022, Vol.22, 3630. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3630
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Luke Huszar, Tair Vizel, Marisa Carrasco; Exogenous attention effects persist into Visual Working Memory. Journal of Vision 2022;22(14):3630. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3630.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Rationale. The sensory recruitment hypothesis posits that Visual Working Memory (VWM) maintenance depends on the same cortical machinery responsible for online perception, implying similarity between perceptual and VWM representations. Characterizing similarities and differences in these representations is critical for understanding how the brain reformats perceptions into durable working memories. Goal. Here, we investigated whether transient modulations to perception via exogenous attention are preserved after VWM encoding. A stimulus viewed with exogenous attention appears higher in contrast than it is, but this change in perceived contrast disappears with the decay of exogenous attention (~500ms after cue onset). If these transient dynamics continue after exogenously attended perceptual representations are encoded into VWM, then the boost to apparent contrast should fade over a delay period. Alternatively, if the encoding process freezes ongoing modulations, maintaining a snapshot of the perception from the time of encoding, then the boost to apparent contrast should persist. Method. Observers performed a delayed contrast comparison task. On each trial, a Gabor stimulus was briefly presented and after a variable delay period (500 or 2000ms), a comparison Gabor was presented. Participants reported which Gabor was higher in contrast. Exogenous attention was manipulated through cues that appeared above the location of the first, second, or both stimuli 100ms before their onset. Results. When the first stimulus was viewed during exogenous attention,the attentional boost to perceived contrast persisted across both delay periods to the same extent. In other words, VWM consistently sustained the attentional effect on representation present at the time of encoding. Conclusion. This finding reveals that VWM representations differ from percepts in terms of WVM’s robustness against transient changes. VWM maintains a snapshot of the percept as it was at the encoding time rather than preserving the transient modulations characteristic of exogenous attention on perception.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×