December 2022
Volume 22, Issue 14
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2022
Population receptive field size varies between thin vs. thick stripes in cortical areas V2/V3
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Roger Tootell
    Massachusetts General Hospital
    Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging
    Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School
  • Louis Vinke
    Massachusetts General Hospital
    Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging
  • Bryan Kennedy
    Massachusetts General Hospital
    Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging
  • Shahin Nasr
    Massachusetts General Hospital
    Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging
    Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This work was supported by NIH NEI (grant R01EY030434), and by the MGH/HST Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging. Crucial resources were made available by a NIH Shared Instrumentation Grant S10-RR019371.
Journal of Vision December 2022, Vol.22, 3622. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3622
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Roger Tootell, Louis Vinke, Bryan Kennedy, Shahin Nasr; Population receptive field size varies between thin vs. thick stripes in cortical areas V2/V3. Journal of Vision 2022;22(14):3622. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3622.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Introduction: Variations in population receptive field (pRF) size are crucially related to the sensitivity to spatial frequency (SF) across visual cortex, across both cortical areas, and across the representation of retinotopic eccentricity in each area. For instance, cortical sites that represent peripheral (compared to central) visual fields have larger pRF sizes and respond more strongly to stimuli with lower SFs. However, within a given retinotopic representation, it remains unknown whether pRF size differs with variations in columnar sensitivity (e.g. color, disparity, motion, etc.). Here we tested this hypothesis, partly by leveraging a prior finding: we found a stronger response to low SF stimuli in V2/V3 thick stripes, compared to thin stripes (Tootell and Nasr, 2017). Methods: Using high-resolution fMRI (7T; voxel size: 1 mm isotropic), in 4 human subjects, we measured the pRF size by presenting moving bars at multiple orientations and motion directions. In two individuals, we also measured the reproducibility of the results by scanning them on two different days. In all subjects, we also independently localized V2/V3 thin vs. thick stripes (Tootell and Nasr, 2021). Results: Consistent with previous studies, in all individuals, we found a larger pRF in peripheral vs. central representations, and a progressively larger pRF size in V1<V2<V3<V3A. The pRF sizes were reproducible across sessions, in both deep and superficial cortical layers (r>0.39). Here, we found that average pRF size in V2/V3 was significantly larger in thick compared to thin stripes, even when the measurements were confined to iso-eccentric (3˚<r<10˚) representations. In all subjects, this effect was observed within both deep and superficial layers, consistent with a columnar organization. Conclusion: Our results show primary evidence for a heterogeneous, column-based distribution of pRF sizes at iso-eccentric sites. This supports the hypothesis that pRF size co-varies with column-scale variations in sensitivity to SF.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×