December 2022
Volume 22, Issue 14
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2022
The Ebbinghaus illusion influences cursor movement but not final accuracy or movement time in a point-and-click task
Author Affiliations
  • Ryan W. Langridge
    Perception and Action Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Canada
  • Jonathan J. Marotta
    Perception and Action Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Canada
Journal of Vision December 2022, Vol.22, 3594. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3594
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ryan W. Langridge, Jonathan J. Marotta; The Ebbinghaus illusion influences cursor movement but not final accuracy or movement time in a point-and-click task. Journal of Vision 2022;22(14):3594. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3594.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Using a trackpad to control an on-screen cursor requires the transformation of proximal finger movements into distal cursor movements displayed within the screen’s allocentric reference frame. Transforming a visually guided action into scene-based coordinates may increase the degree of perceptual influence during a point-and-click task. In this study, the Ebbinghaus illusion was used in three experiments to explore how the perceived size of an on-screen target influences cursor movements and click-point accuracy. Participants completed the experiment remotely, using the trackpad of their personal laptop computers. The task involved a series of trials requiring participants to click on a single circular target presented at either the left or right side of the screen as quickly and accurately as possible (Experiment 1), or to emphasize speed (Experiment 2) or accuracy (Experiment 3). On each trial the target was either surrounded by small or large context circles, or no context circles. Trials presenting veridically smaller or larger targets without context circles were also included for comparison. A size comparison task demonstrated participants’ perceptual size judgments were influenced by the illusory context. However, the illusion failed to produce differences in click-point accuracy or movement time. Interestingly, cursor trajectories demonstrated an increased number of direction changes when clicking the Perceived Large target compared to the Perceived Small target in Experiment 1. This comparison was replicated in Experiment 2, but only when the targets were presented on the right side of the screen. The number of directional changes increased for all target types except for the Perceived Small target in Experiment 3. These results suggest the planning and early stages of cursor movement may have been influenced by the perceptual illusory context while later stages were not, and cursor movements directed toward targets perceived as smaller required less correction compared to targets perceived as larger.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×