December 2022
Volume 22, Issue 14
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2022
Multimodal benefit for low-level visual working memory
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Vivien Chopurian
    Department of Psychology, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, 10099, Germany
    Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, 10115, Germany
  • Christoph Bledowski
    Institute of Medical Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main 60528, Germany
    Brain Imaging Center, Medical Faculty, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main 60528, Germany
  • Thomas Christophel
    Department of Psychology, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, 10099, Germany
    Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, 10115, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This work was supported by DFG Emmy Noether Research Group Grant CH 1674/2-1
Journal of Vision December 2022, Vol.22, 3494. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3494
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Vivien Chopurian, Christoph Bledowski, Thomas Christophel; Multimodal benefit for low-level visual working memory. Journal of Vision 2022;22(14):3494. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3494.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Working memory can store information in multiple brain regions including primary sensory, parietal, and frontal cortices. Such an architecture could lead to a behavioural benefit when storing items from different sensory modalities (multimodal memory) over storing items from the same modality (unimodal memory). Here, we investigated whether such a multimodal benefit exists for low-level auditory and visual features. We used a delayed estimation task with two samples per trial and a retro cue after the delay. Crucially, this means participants had to keep two features in mind during the whole delay period. Sample stimuli consisted of either the orientation of a Gabor patch or the frequency of a pure tone and could be paired with stimuli either from the same or the other modality. In 40 healthy adults, we observed that memorizing a tone and an orientation led to a decrease in orientation error compared to keeping two orientations in mind. Further analysis indicates that this multimodal benefit might be due to decreased precision of the orientation recall in the unimodal condition. We did not find a difference in error when recalling pitch stimuli between the unimodal and bimodal condition. The decrease in precision in the visual unimodal task could be the result of a change in the allocation of neuronal resources for working memory storage. To avoid interference between multiple stimuli in sensory areas, individual items could be allocated to anterior brain regions representing these items in a less precise and more abstract format. In our task, memorizing two items from different modalities would then rely more on the respective sensory cortices resulting in increased precision.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×