December 2022
Volume 22, Issue 14
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2022
Is accommodative control sufficient to overcome the propinquity of enclosed stimulus displays during distance heterophoria measurement?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Kevin Willeford
    NOVA Southeastern College of Optometry
  • Zoeanne Schinas
    NOVA Southeastern College of Optometry
  • Ilira Caboku
    NOVA Southeastern College of Optometry
  • Cassidy Lawless
    NOVA Southeastern College of Optometry
  • Julia Malone
    NOVA Southeastern College of Optometry
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  Beta Sigma Kappa Fellowship; NSU HPD Educational Research Grant
Journal of Vision December 2022, Vol.22, 3409. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3409
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kevin Willeford, Zoeanne Schinas, Ilira Caboku, Cassidy Lawless, Julia Malone; Is accommodative control sufficient to overcome the propinquity of enclosed stimulus displays during distance heterophoria measurement?. Journal of Vision 2022;22(14):3409. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3409.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Introduction. Optometrists now utilize hand-held devices with enclosed stimulus displays to measure heterophorias. These instruments intend to accurately measure heterophorias at any simulated viewing distance; however, the proximity of the stimulus display necessitates minimization of the accommodative response when measuring heterophorias intended to reflect far viewing distances. We measured heterophorias with or without blur feedback to ask whether this minimization is best achieved via opening (OP) or clamping (CLA) the accommodative loop. Methods. The Eyelink 1000 Plus recorded the eye positions of seven observers under open loop fusional vergence conditions. Each observer wore a +3.00 ADD and viewed an enclosed stimulus display (33 cm) with red and blue dichroic filters. The stimulus, presented in primary gaze to the left eye, was blue and either opened (OP, a low spatial frequency DoG) or clamped (CLA, a high spatial frequency cross) the accommodative loop. Quaternions were used to estimate the horizontal distance heterophoria by first computing (kR, kL) and then comparing (p = kL * kR') the horizontal component of each quaternion across forty one-minute blocks. Results. The horizontal heterophoria across all blocks and participants in the OP and CLA conditions was convergent, with values (mean ± SEM) of -0.037 +/- 0.003 and -0.018 +/- 0.005, respectively. The lower limit of the 95% CI representing the difference (CLA – OP) between these two conditions fluctuated between values at or above zero throughout the course of the experiment. Conclusions. The presence of blur feedback promoted divergence; however, the convergent position of the eyes (~ 2° to 3°) in both conditions suggests a contribution from proximal vergence was present. Thus, the inclusion of monocular depth cues fostering a sense of farness is likely necessary to completely surmount the propiniquity of the stimulus display when measuring distance heterophorias in enclosed devices.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×