December 2022
Volume 22, Issue 14
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2022
Systematic bias in visual working memory for image style
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Yana Yu
    Kyoto University
  • Hiroyuki Tsuda
    Keio University
  • Hiroki Yamamoto
    Kyoto University
  • Jun Saiki
    Kyoto University
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This research was supported by Grants 20H00107 of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
Journal of Vision December 2022, Vol.22, 3965. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3965
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Yana Yu, Hiroyuki Tsuda, Hiroki Yamamoto, Jun Saiki; Systematic bias in visual working memory for image style. Journal of Vision 2022;22(14):3965. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3965.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Previous studies have shown systematic bias in memory for various visual features. For example, a study on visual working memory for color showed that responses drawn from working memory are significantly biased away from category boundaries and toward category centers (Bae, Olkkonen, Allred, & Flombaum, 2015). Our previous work found that systematic memory bias toward category center also occurs in long-term memory for high-level visual features such as image style (Yu, Takeda, Tsuda, & Saiki, 2020). Here we report our work on short-term memory for image style. We used the style transfer technique (Gatys, Ecker, & Bethge, 2016) to convert scene photos into painting-like scene images. Based on the painting styles of four well-known artworks by Rembrandt, Braque, Monet, and Kandinsky, we created image series (72 image styles for each of 72 scenes) in which the style changes continuously between those prototypical painting styles. Styles that are near the four prototypes are called “prototypical styles”, and styles that are between prototypes are called “mixed styles” (e.g., styles that mix Monet and Kandinsky’s style together). In each trial, participants looked at a painting-like scene image (sample image) for 2 seconds and tried to memorize the style. After a brief interval, an image that contained the same content and different style from the sample image was shown. Participants were asked to adjust the style to reproduce the sample image. Opposite to what we previously found for long-term memory, response frequency data show that more responses were made for mixed-style stimuli compared with near-prototypical stimuli, though all the styles appeared with the same frequency in sample images. Taken together, the results suggest that systematic bias also exists in visual working memory for image style, while the pattern is different from that of long-term memory.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×