December 2022
Volume 22, Issue 14
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2022
Other-Race Faces Are Not Homogeneous: Evidence from Action Inhibition
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Viola Benedetti
    University of Florence, Florence, Italy
  • Peter De Lissa
    University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
  • Fabio Giovannelli
    University of Florence, Florence, Italy
  • Gioele Gavazzi
    University of Florence, Florence, Italy
  • Maria Pia Viggiano
    University of Florence, Florence, Italy
  • Roberto Caldara
    University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This project was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation, grant number- 100019_189018
Journal of Vision December 2022, Vol.22, 3938. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3938
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Viola Benedetti, Peter De Lissa, Fabio Giovannelli, Gioele Gavazzi, Maria Pia Viggiano, Roberto Caldara; Other-Race Faces Are Not Homogeneous: Evidence from Action Inhibition. Journal of Vision 2022;22(14):3938. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3938.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Modern societies are multicultural and multiracial. Race is a visual signal transmitted by faces used for the early categorization of ingroup/outgroup members, strongly modulating their identification and social processing. However, whether the effect of race might also have an influence on action control, particularly on the executive function of action inhibition, has not been investigated yet. To this aim, Western Caucasian observers performed a Stop-Signal Task (SST) where they were instructed to inhibit their actions in response to faces. Stop signals were African-American (AA), Eastern-Asian (EA) and Western-Caucasian (WC) faces normalized for spatial frequency, spectra and contrast. Importantly, race information was not relevant for task execution. The Stop Signal Delay (SSD) was adjusted dynamically for each face category (AA,EA,WC) with the standard adaptive tracking-procedure. Inhibition efficiency was investigated for each race: from inhibition functions, i.e. p(response|stop signal) respectively to SSDs fitted through a Weibull function, we extrapolated critical SSD values (0.5 proportion of inhibitory failures). Moreover, the Stop Signal Reaction Time (SSRT, measure of inhibitory latency) was also measured. Additionally, an Implicit Association Task (IAT) was conducted for each face race to assess both implicit racial attitudes with positive/negative semantics and the speed of face categorization by race. Our data show that WC observers reported better inhibition efficiency for AA faces compared to EA and WC. Additionally, from the IAT we found higher associations with negative semantics for AA compared to both WC and EA faces, as well as the other-race face categorization advantage. However, these two measures did not correlate with action inhibition efficiency. Our data show that other-race faces cannot be considered as a visual and homogeneous social category. The present finding offers new insights and future directions on the many interactions between the visual and social processes related to the visual early extraction of race from faces.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×