December 2022
Volume 22, Issue 14
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2022
Categorical Biases Emulate Verbal Coding in Visual Working Memory
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Joana Pereira Seabra
    Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience and Berlin Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, Berlin, Germany
  • Vivien Chopurian
    Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience and Berlin Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, Berlin, Germany
  • Andreea-Maria Gui
    Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience and Berlin Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, Berlin, Germany
  • Thomas B. Christophel
    Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience and Berlin Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, Berlin, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This work was supported by DFG Emmy Noether Research Group Grant CH 1674/2-1
Journal of Vision December 2022, Vol.22, 3914. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3914
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Joana Pereira Seabra, Vivien Chopurian, Andreea-Maria Gui, Thomas B. Christophel; Categorical Biases Emulate Verbal Coding in Visual Working Memory. Journal of Vision 2022;22(14):3914. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3914.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Categorical biases in working memory can impact our recollection of visual stimuli. Individual colors, locations, and orientations are often biased towards or away from boundaries and prototypes of stimulus categories (like ‘red’ or ‘vertical’). Color naming data can be used to predict these biases in behavioral and neural data. This suggests that sensory working memory performance is affected by the strategic use of verbal or semantic labels for memorization. Here, we investigated whether we could find a link between categorical biases and verbal labels for orientation and spatial working memory. 40 subjects performed standard orientation and spatial working memory tasks. These tasks were followed by a series of prompts to freely label orientation and location stimuli by typing words they would use for memorization. Replicating prior work, we report that participants’ accuracy is significantly higher when recalling cardinal locations and orientations compared to non-cardinal ones. Moreover, recall error for non-cardinal stimuli was biased away from cardinals. This pattern of cardinal and non-cardinal recall errors resembled verbal labeling strategies: Terms for cardinal stimuli were used sparsely and precisely (e.g. vertical, horizontal, up) while terms describing non-cardinal stimuli were used more liberally and unspecifically (e.g. diagonal). Furthermore, we observe several spatial imbalances in word use suggesting that (1) orientation working memory relies on spatial representations of the upper visual field and that (2) lateral terms (left, right) are more dominant than vertical terms (e.g. top) during spatial working memory. This suggests that cardinal biases in both orientation and location stimuli could be explained in part by the use of verbal or semantic strategies during sensory working memory. In other words, visuospatial working memory might be in part verbal. Finally, these results highlight the need to study how different cortical stores implement these different categorical and non-categorical facets of spatial and orientation stimuli.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×