December 2022
Volume 22, Issue 14
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2022
Seeing the unconscious? Limited awareness for involuntary microsaccades
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jan-Nikolas Klanke
    Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
    Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
  • Sven Ohl
    Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
  • Martin Rolfs
    Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
    Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  J.N.K. was supported by a graduate school scholarship by the Berlin School of Mind and Brain. S.O. was supported by a DFG research grant (OH 274/2-2). M.R. was supported by the Heisenberg Programme of the DFG (grants RO 3579/8-1 and RO 3579/12-1).
Journal of Vision December 2022, Vol.22, 3878. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3878
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jan-Nikolas Klanke, Sven Ohl, Martin Rolfs; Seeing the unconscious? Limited awareness for involuntary microsaccades. Journal of Vision 2022;22(14):3878. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3878.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Microsaccades are miniscule motor acts widely assumed to be generated in complete absence of the observers’ awareness. Recent evidence, however, demonstrated that microsaccades can be generated voluntarily and with high precision (Poletti et al. 2020), suggesting conscious accessibility. Here, we examined if observers can recognize the microsaccades they spontaneously generate and, moreover, if microsaccade-contingent visual stimulus presentations alter the awareness of these involuntary motor acts. We displayed a vertically oriented grating with a rapid temporal phase shift (>60 Hz) that rendered the stimulus invisible during slow fixational eye movements. The grating became briefly visible when it slowed down on the retina, either because the observer spontaneously generated a microsaccade in the direction of the phase shift (active condition) or when the retinal consequence of a previous microsaccade was replayed back to the observer (replay condition). In additional control trials, no stimulus was displayed at all. At the end of each trial, observers reported first if they perceived the stimulus and second whether they believed to have generated a microsaccade. Depending on the answers to these questions, observers additionally rated their confidence that the perceived stimulus was or was not caused by a microsaccade. In both the active and replay condition, observers were highly sensitive to the stimulus in trials in which their microsaccade—or the replayed microsaccade—matched the stimulus’ phase shift’s direction and velocity. This suggests that the retinal consequences of microsaccades alone (i.e., retinal motion) account for the observed sensitivity. In contrast, observers’ sensitivity to whether they generated a microsaccade was very low, in particular, when a stimulus was displayed. Finally, confidence about the cause of the stimulus percept was comparable for active and replay condition trials. Together, these results suggest that microsaccades, if generated spontaneously, indeed escape awareness.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×