December 2022
Volume 22, Issue 14
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2022
Centroid judgments are substance indifferent and therefore based on a salience map
Author Affiliations
  • Lingyu Gan
    University of California, Irvine
  • George Sperling
    University of California, Irvine
Journal of Vision December 2022, Vol.22, 3832. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3832
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Lingyu Gan, George Sperling; Centroid judgments are substance indifferent and therefore based on a salience map. Journal of Vision 2022;22(14):3832. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3832.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

A salience map is a topographical map where only salience (importance) is recorded at each spatial location without any record the features that produced the salience (Koch and Ullman, 1985). Substance indifference is a defining feature of salience maps. Although used originally to order the action-priority of locations, Sperling & Lu (1995) and Gan, Sun, & Sperling (2021) showed that that third-order motion direction and distance judgments between two equal size items in the frontal plane are computed on a salience map. Here, we demonstrate that centroid judgments also are based on the information recorded in a salience map. We presented subjects with stimuli containing 32 stimulus items for 300 msec immediately followed by a 50-msec blank field and a 100-msec mask. Three experienced subjects estimated the centroid (“center of gravity”) of all stimulus items by moving and clicking a mouse cursor. Each subject completed 400 trials with complete feedback after each trial. The critical variable was the composition of the stimulus items: 32 items had either the same feature or 2, 4, or 8 different features. Items varied in color, shape, and luminance (<,=,>) relative to the background. Eight different compositions of stimulus items were tested in a mixed-list design. Results: For all subjects, centroid judgment accuracy was statistically equivalent for all 8 compositions. Being of identical composition offered zero advantage for judged centroid accuracy over being heterogeneously different. Conclusion: Centroid judgments are substance indifferent and are made on the basis of a salience map.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×