December 2022
Volume 22, Issue 14
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2022
Blind-field and intact-field training differentially impact retinal thinning after V1 damage
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Berkeley Fahrenthold
    University of Rochester
  • Matthew Cavanaugh
    University of Rochester
  • Madhura Tamhankar
    University of Pennsylvania
  • Byron Lam
    University of Miami
  • Steven Feldon
    University of Rochester
  • Krystel Huxlin
    University of Rochester
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  NIH/BEI R01 EY027314 NIH/NEI P30 EY001319 Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB) Foundation
Journal of Vision December 2022, Vol.22, 3708. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3708
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Berkeley Fahrenthold, Matthew Cavanaugh, Madhura Tamhankar, Byron Lam, Steven Feldon, Krystel Huxlin; Blind-field and intact-field training differentially impact retinal thinning after V1 damage. Journal of Vision 2022;22(14):3708. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.3708.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Damage to the primary visual cortex (V1) causes homonymous visual field loss affecting both eyes. Multiple reports have shown that V1 damage initiates trans-synaptic retrograde degeneration. Here, we examined the time-course of degeneration at the level of the inner retina, and asked if visual restoration training impacts its progression. We recruited 48 participants (59±10yrs, 37/48 males) 3-379 months after occipital stroke, and 6 visually-intact controls (52±14yrs, 1/6 male). The location, size, and severity of visual defects were derived from 24-2 Humphrey automated perimetry and we measured ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer (GCL-IPL) thicknesses on either side of the fovea [corresponding to blind versus intact hemifields] using optical coherence tomography (OCT). A laterality index (LI) was computed from OCT-derived measurements to account for individual variance in retinal thickness. Patients then underwent home-training for 6 months on a direction discrimination task. Half were randomized to train in their blind field and the other half in their intact hemifield, after which Humphreys and OCTs were repeated. Pre-training, blind-field GCL-IPLs were thinner than intact-side GCL-IPL (paired t-test, p<0.0001), generating more positive LI values than in controls (unpaired t-test, p<0.0001), and which increased with time since stroke (p=0.0002, R2=0.2736). Participants trained in their intact field exhibited further GCL-IPL thinning (paired t-test, p=0.008) and increased LI (paired t-test, p=0.009) when re-measured post-training, suggesting progression of the degeneration. Participants trained in their blind field did not. Thus, GCL-IPL shrinkage is evident on retinal imaging after stroke-induced V1 damage, showing gradual worsening over time. Progression persists during intact-field training, but appears to be halted during blind-field training. This raises the intriguing possibility that training interventions previously shown to reduce the severity and size of visual field defects may confer retina-specific protection against retrograde degeneration.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×