Abstract
Does attention increase the influence of neighbors in a crowd? Rio, Dachner, & Warren’s (2018) model assumes ensemble perception of crowd motion, and yet it seems that we can follow our friends and ignore others. We adapted the Multiple Object Tracking paradigm to test whether selective attention to a subset of the crowd spontaneously influences following behavior. In Experiment 1, the participant walked with a virtual crowd 9 neighbors, viewed in an HMD. At the beginning of each trial, a target set of 2-6 neighbors, or all 9 neighbors (control), blinked on and off; participants were instructed to attend to and track those neighbors as they walked with the crowd. The heading (walking direction) of targets or distractors was perturbed (±20°) midway through the trial. As a tracking check, a randomized memory probe appeared at the end of the trial. Participant heading, speed, facing direction (yaw angle) and probe responses were recorded. A linear mixed effects regression revealed that participant heading was influenced by the number of turning neighbors (χ2(1) = 17.19, p < 0.001), but not by attention to targets. Rather, participant heading was statistically equivalent to the average heading direction of the crowd (BF01 = 11.90), consistent with ensemble perception. Probe responses were highly accurate, indicating that participants successfully tracked targets. In Experiment 2, we tested whether participants can follow a group of “friends” when explicitly instructed to do so. Participants were first trained to recognize a set of avatar friends, which replaced blinking targets; otherwise the design was the same. In this case, participants fully segmented friends from a crowd of strangers and exclusively followed them (χ2(1) = 59.27, p<0.001), breaking ensemble perception. Subsequent experiments are investigating whether this “friend” effect is due to task-relevant attention (explicit instructions to follow targets) or grouping by familiarity.