December 2022
Volume 22, Issue 14
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2022
What’s in gaze, what’s in a face? Emotion expression modulates direct gaze processing
Author Affiliations
  • Robrecht van der Wel
    Rutgers University
  • Anne Böckler
    University of Würzburg
  • Christina Breil
    University of Würzburg
  • Timothy Welsh
    University of Toronto
Journal of Vision December 2022, Vol.22, 4278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.4278
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Robrecht van der Wel, Anne Böckler, Christina Breil, Timothy Welsh; What’s in gaze, what’s in a face? Emotion expression modulates direct gaze processing. Journal of Vision 2022;22(14):4278. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.4278.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Gaze direction and emotion expression are salient facial features that facilitate social interactions. Previous studies addressed how gaze direction influences the evaluation and recognition of emotion expressions, but few have tested how emotion expression influences attentional processing of direct versus averted gaze faces. Here, we present recent evidence from two sets of experiments that the prioritization of direct gaze (towards the observer) relative to averted gaze (away from the observer) is modulated by the emotional expression of the observed face. We establish this in a paradigm in which we manipulated emotion expressions of the faces (neutral, angry, fearful, happy, disgusted) across participants and gaze direction within participants as they identified a target letter on one of four faces. The direct gaze effect was enhanced in angry faces (approach oriented) and reduced in fearful faces (avoidance oriented) in a first study, while angry and fearful expressions diminished any effects of gaze direction in a follow-up. In addition, a consistent direct gaze advantage was found for happy faces and an averted gaze advantage was found for disgusted faces. Together, these results indicated modulation of gaze processing for approach/avoidance-related emotions. We then investigated the temporal integration of gaze and emotion cues by tracking eye movements and performance. We again found evidence for an approach/avoidance-congruency advantage for happy and disgusted faces, both in performance and gaze behavior. Analyses of gaze behavior suggested early integration of gaze and emotion information (starting at 300 ms) that is driven by emotion-specific attention patterns. These findings reveal when and how the context of facial emotion expressions as well as their gaze influences attentional processing.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×