December 2022
Volume 22, Issue 14
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2022
Visual scanning of a jet fighter cockpit dependence on air force experience
Author Affiliations
  • Mariusz Pietrzyk
    The Military Institute of Aviation Medicine
  • Krzysztof Kwalczuk
  • Lukasz Dziuda
Journal of Vision December 2022, Vol.22, 4175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.4175
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Mariusz Pietrzyk, Krzysztof Kwalczuk, Lukasz Dziuda; Visual scanning of a jet fighter cockpit dependence on air force experience. Journal of Vision 2022;22(14):4175. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.4175.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The objective was to characterize visual scanning of a jet fighter cockpit by pilots with different air force experiences using the eye movement monitoring method and flight simulator under G-Force. Total, 28 pilots with various experiences in piloting MIG-29 participated in the study. The fewer experience subjects of 13 have on average 40h of air force training on the jet fighter, whereas the other 15 spend over 860h in MIG-29. Pilots performed basic manoeuvres required for patrolling the air space, including taking off, turning, landing. Experiments were conducted using an overload centrifuge for the MIG-29 flight simulator. The vision system of the simulator provides a wide field of view (120x70°) and high-resolution images required to visualize the terrain and aerial situation in all lighting and weather conditions. The visual scene was divided into 22 ROI affiliated to cockpit’s instrument and out of widow area. Eye-tracking was facilitated with The GLASSES portable google sensor manufactured by Sensomotoric Instruments GmBH (SMI, Tetlow, Germany). ANOVA of total dwell time and average fixation duration recorded in each flight phase were run to evaluate statistical significance between the expertise at 95% confidence (p<0.05). Significant differences in total dwell time between novice and experts were revealed while patrolling air space regarding attitude director indicator (ADI) and exhaust gas temperature (EGT). The median duration of fixation was also significantly different on Altimater while turning. Fixation duration on airspeed, EGT, IPV were unique for each group during approach landing. Also, the total duration time on the altimeter and ADI were significantly different. Pilots with various experiences sample visual information from the cockpit differently. Shorter fixations were not necessarily correlated with expertise, as experts dwelled longer on selected cockpit instruments during landing and turning.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×