December 2022
Volume 22, Issue 14
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2022
Spatial Coding of Visual Targets in the Frontal and Supplementary Eye Fields
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Vishal Bharmauria
    York Centre for Vision Research and Vision: Science to Applications Program, York University,Toronto, Canada
  • Adrian Schütz
    Department of Neurophysics, Phillips Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
  • Xiaogang Yan
    York Centre for Vision Research and Vision: Science to Applications Program, York University,Toronto, Canada
  • Hongying Wang
    York Centre for Vision Research and Vision: Science to Applications Program, York University,Toronto, Canada
  • Frank Bremmer
    Department of Neurophysics, Phillips Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
  • John Douglas Crawford
    York Centre for Vision Research and Vision: Science to Applications Program, York University,Toronto, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This project was supported by a Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) Grant and the Vision: Science to Applications (VISTA) Program, which is supported in part by the Canada first Research Excellence Fund, and by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
Journal of Vision December 2022, Vol.22, 4113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.4113
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Vishal Bharmauria, Adrian Schütz, Xiaogang Yan, Hongying Wang, Frank Bremmer, John Douglas Crawford; Spatial Coding of Visual Targets in the Frontal and Supplementary Eye Fields. Journal of Vision 2022;22(14):4113. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.4113.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Previous neurophysiological studies have suggested that visual response fields in the gaze control system primarily utilize an eye-centered frame of reference at both the single unit and population level (Sajad et al. 2015; Sadeh et al. 2016). We recently confirmed that visual responses to saccade targets in the monkey frontal (FEF) and supplementary eye fields (SEF) showed a preference for eye-centered coding at the population level, even in the presence of a large visual landmark (Bharmauria et al. 2020, 2021). Specifically, visual activity showed less variance when plotted relative to target-in-eye coordinates (Te) as opposed to Th (head) or Ts (space) coordinates. Here, we re-examined this database at the single unit level, and used a more sensitive spatial continuum analysis in the spatially tuned visual responses of 102 FEF neurons and 43 SEF neurons. We found that, consistent with previous reports, approximately 95 % of tuned FEF neurons preferentially coded for Te. However, in the case of SEF, neurons almost equally preferred Te, Th and Ts. Our continuum analysis (of fits between these three models, i.e., Te-Ts, Te-Th and Ts-Th) showed distribution peaks near Te, Th and Ts with a sparse scattering of best fits in between these continua. These data suggest that whereas FEF retains a fairly simple egocentric visual code, SEF visual responses can show more complex levels of spatial preprocessing (at least in the presence of a visual landmark). This result seems to complement the finding where it was shown that SEF stimulation is capable of producing gaze shifts toward eye, head, or space-fixed goals (Martinez-Trujillo et al. 2004).

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×