December 2022
Volume 22, Issue 14
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2022
OPA responds to visual information about walking, not crawling
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Christopher M Jones
    Emory University
  • Joshua Byland
    Emory University
  • Daniel D Dilks
    Emory University
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  Funding provided by National Eye Institute to D.D.D. (Grant R01 EY029724)
Journal of Vision December 2022, Vol.22, 4072. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.4072
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Christopher M Jones, Joshua Byland, Daniel D Dilks; OPA responds to visual information about walking, not crawling. Journal of Vision 2022;22(14):4072. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.4072.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The occipital place area (OPA) – a cortical region supporting “visually-guided navigation” (i.e., finding our way through the immediately visible environment) in adulthood – has recently been found to be late developing, not fully functional until around 8 years old. But how is this prolonged development possible given that we move through our local environment long before 8 years old, often beginning with crawling followed by “toddler” walking? One possibility is that OPA represents only the visual information from an “adult-like” walking perspective, and not from the other perspectives encountered during early development. To directly test this hypothesis, using fMRI in 15 human adults, we measured the responses in OPA to videos depicting the actual first-person visual experience of navigating the immediate environment – from either a “walking” or “crawling” perspective, as well as two baseline perspectives (i.e., an aerial “flying” perspective and a “scrambled” version of the walking videos). Consistent with our hypothesis, we found that OPA responded significantly more to the walking videos compared to the crawling, flying, and scrambled ones. Critically, we also found that OPA responded similarly to the crawling, flying, and scrambled videos, indicating that OPA doesn't respond to crawling information any more than either a perspective by which humans don't navigate (“flying”) or a non-navigable perspective all together (“scrambled”). This pattern of results was unique to OPA, and was not found in other scene-selective regions, motion-selective cortex, or primary visual cortex – ruling out any general attentional, motion, or low-level visual information accounts. Collectively, these results reveal that OPA is “tuned” to visual information about adult-like walking, not crawling, consistent with its prolonged development hypothesis, and raise the intriguing question of whether crawling (and early walking) is a mode of visually-guided navigation at all, or is processed by a different neural system all together.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×