December 2022
Volume 22, Issue 14
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2022
Does attention to a point in time lead to temporal surround suppression?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Shira Tkacz-Domb
    York University
  • Yaffa Yeshurun
    University of Haifa
  • John K. Tsotsos
    York University
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  Funded by Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-18-1-0054), the Canada Research Chairs Program (950-231659), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2016-05352), and the Israeli Council for Higher Education - Planning and Budgeting Committee.
Journal of Vision December 2022, Vol.22, 4307. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.4307
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Shira Tkacz-Domb, Yaffa Yeshurun, John K. Tsotsos; Does attention to a point in time lead to temporal surround suppression?. Journal of Vision 2022;22(14):4307. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.14.4307.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The Selective Tuning (ST) model of visual attention proposed that selection of an attended element includes suppression of the visual network portions that surround the attended element. When attending to a particular location or feature, processing of visual information at nearby locations or features is suppressed. Here, we investigated whether attending to a point in time leads to suppression at nearby time points. We presented a sequence of 11 letters at the screen’s center (SOA 100 ms). One of these letters was the target T, and observers indicated its orientation. In the informative blocks, the target appeared in the same frame within the sequence on most of the trials (‘expected’ condition). On the rest of the trials, the target appeared one or two frames before/after the most-probable frame (‘unexpected’ condition). The most-probable frame varied between blocks. The observers were told which is the most-probable frame at the beginning of the block. In the neutral block, the target appeared randomly in one of the frames. We found significantly higher accuracy in the expected condition than in the neutral and unexpected conditions, indicating that participants allocated temporal attention to the most-probable frame. Furthermore, when the target appeared after the expected frame, the accuracy was significantly lower in the unexpected frame compared to the same frame in the neutral condition, suggesting temporal suppression after the attended time. Consistent with ST's predictions, such an attention-driven temporal suppression may play a role in the precise timing required for dynamic visual behaviors.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×