August 2023
Volume 23, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2023
The difference between social attention and non-social attention lies in attention disengagement rather than attention orientation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Shengyuan Wang
    Sun Yat-sen University
  • Yanhua Lin
    Sun Yat-sen University
  • Xiaowei Ding
    Sun Yat-sen University
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32271103), Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (19YJC190004), and Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2021A1515011103) to Xiaowei Ding
Journal of Vision August 2023, Vol.23, 5045. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.5045
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Shengyuan Wang, Yanhua Lin, Xiaowei Ding; The difference between social attention and non-social attention lies in attention disengagement rather than attention orientation. Journal of Vision 2023;23(9):5045. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.5045.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Whether the attention triggered by social cues and non-social cues share the same mechanism has been a controversial topic. While most previous studies focused on the process of attention orientation, this study examined the difference between social and non-social attention in attention disengagement. We developed a two-stage attention-orientation paradigm and used eye-tracking to detailed capture the attention-disengagement process. In the first stage, the gaze/arrow directed participants’ attention to an object where the target appeared in high probability. In the second stage, a Landolt-C appeared and participants needed to respond to its direction. In most trials, the Landolt-C appeared in the attended object. In other trials, the Landolt-C appeared at a random location outside the object, participants needed to disengage their attention from the previous-attended object and redirect to the target. Both Experiments 1 and 2 adopted this two-stage attention-orientation paradigm. Experiment 1 used schematic stimuli (gaze, arrow, object), while Experiment 2 used real-life stimuli and put them in real-scene backgrounds. The results of both experiments showed that there was no difference in the attention-orientation stage: the gaze and arrow directed participants’ attention into the object simultaneously. However, when the participants needed to disengage their attention from the previous-attended object, the gaze cue led to a faster disengagement than arrow, indicating that social attention was more flexible and less trapped in objects. To explore the mechanism of social attention’s faster disengagement, Experiment 3 required participants to search the whole real scenes made of objects and backgrounds for a Landolt-C followed by gaze/arrow cues. Results showed that during the whole searching process, social attention was less trapped in objects than non-social attention, indicating social attention was less distracted by task-irrelevant objects. To conclude, our research supported that social attention was more flexible and disengaged more efficiently from the previous-attended object.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×