August 2023
Volume 23, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2023
Binocular contrast adaptation explained by separate gain controls before and after the site of binocular summation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Frederick Kingdom
    McGill University
  • Paul Lerner
    University of Alberta
  • Mark Georgeson
    Aston University
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  Supported by a CIHR (Canadian Institute of Health Research) grant #MOP 123349 given to F.K. and by Dr. Clarke K. McLeod Memorial Scholarships and a Class of Medicine 1960 Research Bursary given to P.L.
Journal of Vision August 2023, Vol.23, 5001. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.5001
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Frederick Kingdom, Paul Lerner, Mark Georgeson; Binocular contrast adaptation explained by separate gain controls before and after the site of binocular summation. Journal of Vision 2023;23(9):5001. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.5001.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Adaptation to contrast elevates contrast detection/discrimination thresholds and reduces apparent contrast. The study of binocular contrast adaptation over the past 50 years has focused on the relative effect of adapting and testing to the same compared to opposite eyes in order to yield a measure of interocular transfer (IOT), a protocol that only involves monocular adapting and test stimuli. However a full characterization of binocular adaptation requires measurements of binocular as well monocular adapting and test stimuli. Using 3.6 cpd grating stimuli we measured threshold versus contrast (TvC) functions for the full gamut of combinations of monocular and binocular adapting and test stimuli. For each combination of adapt/test eye(s), the adapted TvC data followed the classic 'dipper' curve similar to the unadapted data, but displaced obliquely to higher contrasts. Adaptation had effectively re-scaled all contrasts by a common factor Cs that varied with the combination of adapt and test eye(s), an example of contrast gain control. Cs was well described by a simple 2-parameter model that had separate gain controls, sited before and after binocular summation respectively. When these 2 levels of adaptation were inserted into an existing model for contrast discrimination, the extended 2-stage model gave a good account of the TvC functions, their shape invariance with adaptation, and the contrast scaling factor.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×