August 2023
Volume 23, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2023
Visual Search Patterns in Cerebral Visual Impairment (CVI) Are Driven by Saliency Cues When Exploring Naturalistic Scenes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Claire Manley
    Mass. Eye and Ear
  • Kerri Walter
    Northeastern University
  • Peter Bex
    Northeastern University
  • Lotfi Merabet
    Mass. Eye and Ear
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  NIH/NEI R01 EY030973 to LBM
Journal of Vision August 2023, Vol.23, 4941. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.4941
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Claire Manley, Kerri Walter, Peter Bex, Lotfi Merabet; Visual Search Patterns in Cerebral Visual Impairment (CVI) Are Driven by Saliency Cues When Exploring Naturalistic Scenes. Journal of Vision 2023;23(9):4941. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.4941.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Higher order visual perceptual deficits are a cardinal feature in individuals with cerebral visual impairment (CVI). We investigated visual search behavior in CVI participants (n=16; mean age=16.00 yrs ± 5.03 SD) and neurotypical controls (n=31; mean age=20.59 yrs ± 5.56 SD). Participants searched for a target in a series of 80 naturalistic LabelMe scenes (mixture of indoor and outdoor scenes, fixed presentation time of 4 sec) in response to either an image cue or text cue while gaze behavior was recorded with an eye tracker (Tobii 4C; 90 Hz). Target identification accuracy and reaction time (RT) were collected. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses comparing the distribution of eye gaze patterns to an image saliency (Graph-Based Visual Saliency) model and semantic saliency (Linguistic Analysis of Semantic Salience) model were also carried out. Compared to controls, CVI participants were less accurate and slower in finding the target for both the image cue (accuracycontrols=91.05% ± 11.70 SD, accuracyCVI=50.63% ± 33.15 SD, t(16.95)=4.72, p<0.001, d=1.89; RTcontrols=1.20 sec ± 0.11 SD, RTCVI=1.77 sec ± 0.34 SD, t(16.78)=-6.44, p<0.001, d=-2.59) and text cue (accuracycontrols=88.06% ± 10.03 SD, accuracyCVI=42.81% ± 30.10 SD, t(16.74)=5.84, p<0.001, d=2.35; RTcontrols=1.37 sec ± 0.18 SD, RTCVI=2.00 sec ± 0.53 SD, t(15.61)=-4.446, p<0.001, d=-1.87) tasks. For the image cue task, controls and CVI participants showed more similar ROC scores with respect to the image saliency model (ROCcontrols=0.80 ± 0.04 SD; ROCCVI=0.74 ± 0.08 SD, t(19.27)=3.31, p=0.002, d=1.23). In contrast, for the text cue task, there was a greater disparity in ROC scores with respect to the semantic model (ROCcontrols=0.83 ± 0.06 SD; ROCCVI=0.65 ± 0.12 SD, t(17.66)=5.58, p<0.001, d=2.16). These findings suggest that CVI participants tend to rely more on image saliency than semantic saliency cues during visual search of naturalistic scenes.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×