August 2023
Volume 23, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2023
Comparing explicit and implicit ensemble perception
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Shaul Hochstein
    ELSC Safra Center for Brain Research & Life Sciences Institute, Hebrew University, Jerusalem
  • Noam Khayat
    ELSC Safra Center for Brain Research & Life Sciences Institute, Hebrew University, Jerusalem
  • Marina Pavlovskaya
    ELSC Safra Center for Brain Research & Life Sciences Institute, Hebrew University, Jerusalem
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  supported by a grant from the Israel Science Foundation (ISF)
Journal of Vision August 2023, Vol.23, 4886. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.4886
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Shaul Hochstein, Noam Khayat, Marina Pavlovskaya; Comparing explicit and implicit ensemble perception. Journal of Vision 2023;23(9):4886. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.4886.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Introduction. Visual scenes are too complex to immediately perceive all their details. As suggested by Gestalt psychologists, grouping similar scene elements expedites evaluating scene gist. Ensemble perception is efficient representation of similar object sets by their summary statistics, overcoming processing, attention and memory limits. Observers are better at perceiving image set means than remembering presence of particular set members. We previously found that ensemble perception occurs explicitly, when observers are asked to judge set mean, and automatically, implicitly, on-the-fly, trial-by-trial, when engaged in an orthogonal task. Ensemble perception includes low-level, (line orientation), and high-level, (category exemplar), variables. There is an inherent paradox in ensemble perception, as in categorization: Ensemble (or category) members share sufficient features to allow recognizing them as belonging to the same set (or category), but each one is different, or we would have a useless tautology. Methods. We now study relationships among these ensemble perception phenomena, testing explicit and implicit ensemble perception; for sets varying in circle size, line orientation, or disc brightness; and with spatial, temporal or spatio-temporal presentation. Following ensemble set presentation, 96 observers were asked if a test image, or which of 2, had been present in the set. Then, subsequent experiments asked the same observers to explicitly judge if the test image was larger, more clockwise, or brighter than the set mean, or which of two test images was closer to the mean. Results. Image presence followed a Gaussian dependence on (relative) distance from set mean, and explicit mean judgement had sigmoidal dependence on (relative) distance from mean. We directly compare these dependences, finding that explicit ensemble averaging is more precise than implicit mean perception – for each ensemble variable, presentation mode, and (1- or 2-image) testing mode. Conclusions. Implicit ensemble-statistics perception has lower precision than tasks requiring explicit ensemble integration.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×