August 2023
Volume 23, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2023
A simple non-linear neural summation model predicts basic and complex motion perception phenomena
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Raúl Luna
    Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Institute of Optics, Madrid, Spain.
  • Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza
    Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Department of Experimental Psychology, Madrid, Spain.
  • Marcelo Bertalmío
    Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Institute of Optics, Madrid, Spain.
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  European Union’s Horizon 2020 (grant 952027. AdMiRe). RL: Juan de la Cierva-Formación (FJC2020-044084-I) by MCIN/AEI /10.13039/501100011033 and by the European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR. ISP: Grant PID2021-122245NB-I00 by MCIN/AEI. MB: Grant PID2021-127373NB-I00 by MCIN/AEI.
Journal of Vision August 2023, Vol.23, 4810. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.4810
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Raúl Luna, Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza, Marcelo Bertalmío; A simple non-linear neural summation model predicts basic and complex motion perception phenomena. Journal of Vision 2023;23(9):4810. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.4810.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Linear receptive fields (RF) are the basis of most vision models. However, they present important flaws: they change with the input, depend on the specific basis functions used to estimate them and contradict studies on dendritic computations. A novel effort has modelled spatial RFs non-linearly [Bertalmío et al., 2020, Scientific reports], giving rise to the intrinsically non-linear receptive field (INRF). Unlike linear RFs, which must vary with the input to predict responses, the INRF can remain constant with varying stimuli and is in better agreement with physiology. Here, we extend the INRF formulation to the spatio-temporal domain so that it can also predict responses to moving stimuli. We perform simulations using bars and drifting gratings, which show that the model successfully explains both basic and complex physiological and psychophysical motion perception phenomena. Specifically, the INRF model signals with a phase-independent response the direction of motion of drifting stimuli; it replicates results about saturation at high contrasts in striate cell responses [Heeger, 1992, Visual neuroscience]; it predicts motion perception reversals in the missing-fundamental and reverse-phi illusions [Adelson & Bergen, 1985, JOSA A]; it is able to explain the direction of motion of second-order stimuli; and it predicts the puzzling illusion of motion reversals that happen at short stimulus durations when a static low spatial frequency pattern is added to a moving high spatial frequency pattern [Serrano-Pedraza et al., 2007, JOV]. To develop predictions, classical motion energy models commonly use cascades of linear-nonlinear stages, while, in a simple way that is consistent with physiology, the INRF model uses nonlinear computations that cannot be decoupled from linear ones. This way, our model reproduces not only key phenomena in motion perception, but also findings that classical models can only explain by incorporating additional stages that increase their complexity and might not be biologically plausible.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×