August 2023
Volume 23, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2023
Consistency of the PRL Across Vergence Demand as a Measure of Objective Fixation Disparity
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Norick R. Bowers
    Justus Liebig Universität Gießen
    University of California Berkeley, Herbert Wertheim School of Optometry & Vision Science
  • Susana T. L. Chung
    University of California Berkeley, Herbert Wertheim School of Optometry & Vision Science
  • Martin S. Banks
    University of California Berkeley, Herbert Wertheim School of Optometry & Vision Science
  • Austin Roorda
    University of California Berkeley, Herbert Wertheim School of Optometry & Vision Science
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This work was supported by a NIH BRP R01EY023591 grant, an NIH T32 EY007043 grant, and a Alexander von Humboldt Foundation research fellowship
Journal of Vision August 2023, Vol.23, 4801. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.4801
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Norick R. Bowers, Susana T. L. Chung, Martin S. Banks, Austin Roorda; Consistency of the PRL Across Vergence Demand as a Measure of Objective Fixation Disparity. Journal of Vision 2023;23(9):4801. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.4801.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The preferred retinal locus of fixation (PRL) is the exact region of the retina where humans place images of fixated stimuli. The PRL is not necessarily at the center of the fovea (the location of peak cone density). However, its location is remarkably stable across days and tasks. It remains unknown if or how the PRL changes under binocular viewing conditions. Subjects reportedly over- or under-converge on targets as a function of vergence demand, a phenomenon known as fixation disparity. This implies that the PRL changes with vergence. However, many of these studies found varying amounts of fixation disparity and relied on eye tracking measurements taken from the anterior segments of the eye to infer the exact retinal position of fixated stimuli. The present study aims to examine the location of the PRL on the retinal surface directly and for both eyes simultaneously through the use of a binocular tracking scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Binocular PRLs for a 15-arcmin-sized fixation stimulus were measured in five emmetropic subjects for three different vergence demands (0°, 4° and 8°). A monocular PRL was also measured for comparison. While previous work would suggest that PRLs would change with vergence demand, our measured PRLs showed only slight variations from one condition to another, with no systematic deviation that would indicate an over- or under-convergence on the target. One or both eyes of some subjects would occasionally deviate from the target in depth but would realign quickly. The deviations were brief and were likely associated with breaks in fusion. Our results indicate that the PRLs of either eye do not change systematically under binocular conditions. This expands on previous findings on the stability of the PRL and shows that it remains consistent not only across days and tasks, but also under binocular conditions.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×