August 2023
Volume 23, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2023
Caricaturing shapes in visual memory
Author Affiliations
  • Subin Han
    University of Oregon
  • Zekun Sun
    Johns Hopkins University
  • Chaz Firestone
    Johns Hopkins University
Journal of Vision August 2023, Vol.23, 4756. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Subin Han, Zekun Sun, Chaz Firestone; Caricaturing shapes in visual memory. Journal of Vision 2023;23(9):4756.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

When representing high-level stimuli such as faces or animals, we tend to emphasize their most salient features — such as a face's prominent cheekbones or a bird's pointed beak. Such ‘mental caricaturing' leaves traces in visual memory, which exaggerates these distinctive qualities when recalling and recognizing the stimulus at another time. How broadly does this phenomenon extend? In particular, might it also apply to more basic units of visual processing? Here, six experiments (N=700 Adults) explored how visual working memory exaggerates the features of even simple geometric shapes, automatically and without any task-related demand to do so. We generated a library of novel shapes, and gradually smoothed their contours — essentially altering the amount of information borne by the visible boundaries. In Experiment 1, participants saw a novel shape at the beginning of each trial; after a brief delay, they adjusted a copy of that shape to match the one they had just seen. Surprisingly, participants consistently reconstructed the shapes in “exaggerated” form — amplifying the curvature of the shapes' contours, enlarging their salient parts, and so on. Experiment 2 generalized this bias to new parameters, showing that the results were not specific to particular ranges of complexity values. Experiment 3 replicated the results with two-alternative forced choice; Experiment 4 ruled out response biases by comparing an online perception condition to a memory condition; and Experiment 5 ruled out strategic responding based on intuitive expectations about the reliability of memory. Finally, Experiment 6 amplified the effects in a serial reproduction experiment ending with a dramatically altered shape. Together, this work demonstrates a new memory distortion, whereby even the most basic units of visual processing are remembered as caricatured versions of themselves.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.